this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
511 points (97.8% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
7996 readers
10 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Bad movies aren't fun if they're bad on purpose, though. They need to be bad because they're a failed attempt at a good movie, made by someone who's either talentless, insane, degenerate, or (ideally) all three. That's why it's so much fun to watch The Room or Double Down or After Last Season: those movies are the sincere but crushed dreams of crazy charlatans. Conversely, that's why crap like Sharknado is so boring, it's because there was no attempt to reach something. Asylum movies like that are the film equivalent of the kind of person who keeps repeating the same three Monty Python references.
In general, I agree that “bad on purpose” movies rarely work the way truly failed passion projects do. Stuff like The Room or Samurai Cop are endlessly fascinating because you’re watching someone’s ambition crash and burn under the weight of their own limitation. It’s failure as unintentional art.
Sharknado and the rest of The Asylum’s output, by contrast, are manufactured junk food. They’re winking at you the whole time, saying “look how silly we are,” which makes the joke wear thin almost instantly.
But Velocipastor doesn't fit into the "Sharknado" camp. The difference is intent. Sharknado had a $2 million budget, a cynical production pipeline, and the backing of a company that churns out disposable content purely because they know it’ll turn a profit on streaming or TV. It’s commerce first, creativity second. Velocipastor, on the other hand, had a shoestring budget of $36k scraped together from personal connections. It’s essentially a backyard passion project made by people who wanted to have fun, and that spirit comes through on screen.
Yeah, it’s deliberately goofy, but it also embraces its limitations in a clever way. Things like the “VFX car explosion” gag or the deliberately clunky dinosaur costume work precisely because the film knows how far it can stretch itself. It’s not pretending to be Hollywood, and it’s not trying to be “so bad it’s good” in a cynical way. It’s more like watching a group of friends get wildly creative with no resources, and instead of feeling hollow like Sharknado, it ends up being genuinely entertaining.
You'd probably enjoy Iron Sky
I’d argue there are multiple types of good bad movies and that it can definitely be done on purpose, Garth Marenghi’s Dark Place is my gold standard for bad on purpose, that show is the greatest. I enjoyed Velocipastor immensely and think they nailed being bad on purpose. I get what you’re saying, though, there is a unique magic that only exists when someone is genuinely and earnestly trying to create a magnum opus to rival the greats and creates utter trash candy, like Wiseau and Neil Breen and his Breen screen.
you go watch Lobster Man from Mars until you enjoy it
one of the aliens is a fuzzy football on a string! and you can still see the string if i remember it's been a while!
Retract your statement or I shall say "Ni!" again.
How do you know 'tis but a messiah?
If this swallow weights the same as a deceased parrot…
A naughty repairman!