542
The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.
The message is "If you disagree with me, you will be banned"
Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.
And this is the second time in just over a day that I've seen moderators abusing the ability to monitor how people vote.
This behaviour undermines good faith participation. Users should not be afraid of copping bans for using the downvote button as they feel is appropriate.
Yeah on closer look it seems like this particular baby strawberry is also a mod on nearly 50 other groups across more than 10 instances. Not good.
Hey I just wanna pop in and say I crossposted your post about lemmyusa over to power tripping bastards on dbzero the other day, and we actually had a mod from there come on and discuss things.
I think its a bit more complex than just... them clearly doing mod abuse or manipulation.
From their POV, they were basically getting hit with a mass wave of downvotes, as well as some genuinely unnaceptable harassment... and they basically panicked and went into lockdown mode.
Maybe you would be interested in adding to that discussion?
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/53271052
Also, just... in general, the whole point of the ye power trippin bastards comm is to report and discuss potential mod/admin abuse scenarios, in case you'd maybe like to post stuff there yourself...
You ... seem to be on something of a tear of call outs, so, maybe you'd be interested.
EDIT: There's... in theory at least, supposed to be more of a structured way of making such a report... which ironically i kinda sorta broke by doing a crosspost, but uh ... ???
Anyway, more specifically relevant to this threelon person... yeah i dont find this behavior surprising, they are obviously a massive elon stan and their personality is collapsing as it becomes harder and harder to deny that, even in just a purely technical sense, leaving politics as far aside as possible... yeah elon is actually just a con artist fradulent idiot.
Thanks for the context and for cross posting, this is turning into an interesting discussion across a wider variety of skill sets. Skill sets, as in the following: power users, people who don't like mods and have done it before, people who have never modded but know exactly how it should be done, basic end users who are former mods.
Hey Verity, I support your right to do this (note: those are all my comments), even if you don't!
Have a great day, and don't shy away from that downvote button <3
Wow, you're calling me out too and I'm not even a mod any more. Keep that powdered wig high and lice-free, Robespierre.
hah 'Robespierre' - Good one, probably.
Just funny you are serial downvoting in defence of banning people for serial downvoting :D
Let me guess, hypocrisy is only cool when you do it.
That's not hypocrisy. People who support moderators rights to ban people from their community for mass downvoting aren't saying no-one should ever downvote, and that all bans for downvoting are automatically justified.
This post is about threelon banning multiple people for downvoting one (1) time on one (1) post.
And it is hypocrisy, along with a helping of poor reading comprehension apparently. If you disagree with this post, you would actually have been banned several times by now lol.
But seeing as you are talking about my other post, how many times do you believe a user should be allowed to disagree before it warrants a ban for disagreeing too much?
Yes, I know what the post is about. I'm just talking about generally here. You can downvote, and still be in favour of public upvoting and downvoting.
That's a false premise regarding my position. It's not about any particular number or specific threshold being met. I think it's reasonable for a community moderator to ban someone who never contributes to the community but instead just downvotes anything on the page. Especially if its a small community trying to grow. There are people on my communities now that downvote, but they also interact and also upvote, and they don't just downvote everything. So it's whatever.
Downvoting is contributing, just in a way you apparently don't like.
You should step down as a mod. Also please leave me alone, we have already had this conversation, and I made myself very clear.
I disagree.
You literally just asked me a question, and I replied.
Furthermore: This is a public thread. I'll reply to who I like.
Cool, just a shitty mod harassing a user because they cant control their emotions. Speaks for itself, really.
Replying to you in a public thread is harassing? You can just block me, you know. Or choose not to reply.
Following me to another thread to relitigate something we have fully explored is creepy stalker behaviour, yes.
I did choose not to reply, in the last thread. Please show some self control.
This is a different chain in the same thread. I browsed it and saw a claim by you I thought was unfair. You ask questions, get answers, make accusations, get pushback and then cry harassment.
I eagerly look forward to receiving my pushbike.
Okay I'm going to stop replying here, for the second time. Please try not to "incidentally" run into me again, it's getting embarrassing.
And you think you are even handed enough to moderate multiple communities? I wouldn't trust you moderate my rice cooker, and it's automatic.
The "pushbike" was autocomplete. Edited now.
Again, this is a public forum. I don't seek anyone down but I feel free to reply to anyone.
I haven't done anything wrong in my communities, and have given the Fediverse their only active TV comm.
As a moderator, I can see who votes on what and how in my community. But it is not my job to really do anything with that information (except if I notice a brigading attack / vote manipulation, then I might keep an eye on users for that). So I don't even look at them. The community hasn't been brigaded yet, and since its a moderately low traffic community, it would be pretty obvious if that ever happened.
But votes are information that normal users should definitely not be able to see at all. Eventually, sooner than later most likely, it will lead to "User X voted 'wrong' on Y" posts. You and I both know Lemmy users cannot be trusted to be mature enough to not do that kind of Fecal Flinging, especially from the comfort of online anonymity, and once that starts it's not going to stop.
Users upvote or downvote posts for ten million different reasons. Nobody should feel like they can't vote how they want on a post for fear of a moderator ban or other users yelling at them. If they are engaging in vote manipulation, its a different story, but people doing that are not only using a single account, so they know what they are doing and should expect nevative consequences. I'm not disagreeing with what you're saying, just adding on that beyond a moderator's ethical duty regarding (not) taking action for vote activity, normal users should also be held to the same ethical duty.
Yes and no.
There are accounts who genuinely do go around downvoting en masse without any contributions. When I was growing my community, I caught about 5 accounts - some with no post history, and no contribution history on my community doing it. They also had a long mod log history of bans for doing it elsewhere.
So I banned them because they kept burying new posts. That is my right.
That's weird, what topic is so controversial someone would put in that kind of effort?
You tell me. I mean I think the accounts I'm referring to here had been downvoting all over the place, not just my community.
It's also blatant vote manipulation in keeping their personal content from being lower on the front page. Ban all the downvoters and suddenly your posts look very popular!