this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
59 points (95.4% liked)
Technology
593 readers
1961 users here now
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No external video links, only native(.mp4,...etc) links under 5 mins.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- Al Jazeera;
- NBC;
- CNBC;
- Substack;
- Tom's Hardware;
- ZDNet;
- TechSpot;
- Ars Technica;
- Vox Media outlets, with exception for Axios;
- Engadget;
- TechCrunch;
- Gizmodo;
- Futurism;
- PCWorld;
- ComputerWorld;
- Mashable;
- Hackaday;
- WCCFTECH;
- Neowin.
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
Misc:
Relevant Communities:
- Beehaw Technology- Technology Related Discussions.
- lemmy.zip Technology- Hard Tech news.
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As much as this makes me uncomfortable, wouldn't it be preferred for someone to use a child-like sex doll to fulfill their fantasies rather than them seeking an actual child? I'm certainly no expert in the mental workings of pedophiles, but it seems like this is a healthier or preferred alternative for society?
What's fucked up is actual real human trafficking probably happens on all these social media sites... But they don't talk about it because it would interrupt the data mining intelligence campaigns.
It's a moral panic, and the funny thing to me is that the resources spent on controlling what dolls people may own could have been spent on actually helping children.
I've read that pedophilic tendencies tend to escalate. Like. Drawings can lead to actual CSAM can lead to actually seeking out the real thing.
How valid this is I don't know, but if this is the way it tends to go then I can see how these dolls could actually be problematic.
That's not even mentioning the "holy fucking shit, this is fucking disgusting" factor of the whole concept of these dolls existing.
Not sure. But there are tons of non-pedo heterosexual men who still have not progressed past anime girls. As much as people wished it progressed to real porn or real girls.
Things also tend to get worse when kept hidden and insulated from help. When even talking about attraction to minors is a social death sentence, or even a literal one, it really doesn't help keep people on a sexually healthy path in life.
A significant portion of America is obsessed with the concept of just quashing anything you don't like, rather than practicing harm reduction and therapy.
If this is supposed to be used as harm reduction and therapy then it should be prescribed and monitored by medical professionals and not advertised on social media platforms.
I agree.
The prison system disagrees.
This article is about Britain.
This is a laughably simplistic view.
Harm-reduction approaches are frequently of dubious value (read the studies, the evidence isn't strong), and often advocated by people who have a vested interest in normalising the behaviour. See Carl Hart who is an open heroin addict, or Terence McKenna who was a delusional shroom-head who performed no research of value. Do you really think that people like Hart or McKenna should be empowered to "reform" substance abusers?
Therapy can be an aid, but just going to therapy doesn't fix anything, and certainly doesn't stop substance abuse.
Unless someone has an internal motivation to quit, they won't and we can't mind control them to do so. Interestingly enough, studies actually do show that jail time does provide a motivator to quit. This is why US drug courts combine it with mandatory rehab and halfway houses, it's actually fairly effective. Much more so than, "pwease go to thewapy!"