this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
607 points (100.0% liked)
WomensStuff
624 readers
282 users here now
Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.
Rules…
- Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
- Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
- Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
- No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
- New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This type of comment is like the friend who makes everything awkward https://youtu.be/EnBdGTX3vZc
It's not, but if you actually need a rebuttal, let's go:
What about this pose is in any way insecure? She is confidently giving the finger to those who don't respect consent.
This is your own opinion and not substantiated by anything here as far as I can see.
There's nothing wrong with people liking brand-name clothes. You personally may have a beef with it but calling it 'lust' is not justified by anything in the image.
Again with the 'lust'? Coffee is such a normal thing. There's nothing here to indicate she's addicted, or a glutton, or in any way out of control. You're reading an insane amount into this simple drawing.
It's not an expectation. She's spelling out exactly the ways in which people try to ignore a woman's lack of consent.
Opportunity to what, have sex she doesn't want to have? Are you serious right now?
Substantiate this please, because again, there's nothing in the image supporting this claim.
You mean the person who's callously disregarding her by ignoring the very clear lack of consent? Because that's the type of person this image is aimed at.
Same comment as above. Who exactly does she owe empathy?
Again, totally unsubstantiated in the image. She's allowed to be proud of herself just like anybody else, but there's nothing excessive here.
You've read a lot of nonsense into this image. Maybe have a think about why that is.
It seems like you're in denial. To respond for the audience...