this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
116 points (99.2% liked)

Privacy

2487 readers
584 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DahGangalang 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Both being unsafe seems the most probably state of things.

Still, something unsafe can still be safer than every other option ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] monogram@feddit.nl -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Why choose if there are other solutions ~~(like tuta)~~ that use open standards

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tuta also locks you down with their lack of IMAP support. You can only use their client. At least Proton has a bridge and allows you to use your own GPG key.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

I thought proton was the only one with a lack of imap, thanks for the info

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Proton does PGP for you. There are countless standards compliant mail services where you could use your own email client and do your own PGP -Thunderbird is probably the easiest but It’s a trade-off.

[–] loudwhisper 4 points 2 days ago

What open standard (that are not used by proton too)? If anything proton uses GPG while tuta uses a custom system (which is why they also encrypt the subject).