this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
379 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25651 readers
2305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 3 points 4 days ago (5 children)

THANKYOU. His views were vile, his behaviour was repugnant, and no doubt the world is better without him. That doesn't mean it's ok to kill someone because their views are awful!! I'm horrified seeing how many people think it's ok to do this

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Soo... who is disenfranchising these Nazis? Who is systematically taking away their resources? Because it looks to me like they keep getting stronger, and I don't know what else will stop them other than fear of death.

Don't forget, fascists ultimately want to horrifically murder anyone who doesn't blindly obey them. So if it must be either civilized people or them... sorry Charlie, you gotta go.

Or did you want to wait and sacrifice a few dozen more innocent people so we could have yet more incontrovertible truth that fascist ideologies always lead to fascist outcomes?

Would I overwhelmingly prefer he was deplatformed for his hate, ridiculed out of every spotlight, or censured through judicial means? Absolutely. 'Vigilante justice' on its own is no justice at all. But if this is a trolley problem, I know for a fact where I'm putting the switch. Do you?

In case you're not familiar: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even he said it was OK and "worth it" if he got killed. He also said that people shouldn't have empathy.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He literally thought empathy was a new and made up concept.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's worse, he didn't think it was new. He knew it was a thing, and he was spreading the Evangelical (Christofascist) "The Sin of Empathy" rhetoric.

One example: https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/the-enticing-sin-of-empathy

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

I hadn't heard of that, thanks.

Regardless of what he may have actually thought this is what he publicly stated:

"I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage."

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah extrajudicial execution has no place in this world! (except for when, for example, trump wants to do it to venezuelans, or something like that. then its a good thing instead of a bad thing)

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's okay to kill Nazis. Because it's not just views. They are spreading violent rhetoric. He spread the white replacement and white genocide bullshit. He spread COVID misinformation. He said blacks were better off before the signing of the Civil Rights act.

He was a dangerous fascist mouthpiece. And now he's not.

Nazi lives don't matter.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 4 days ago

He would have been happy to kill trans people.