this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
171 points (99.4% liked)
Politics
896 readers
392 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is my statement that I am not willing to go a long with what is an obvious lie, no matter how many people or organizations report it without proof.
I understand that that was the legal consensus, but that doesn't make it the truth and this whole fucker is way to shaky for any reputable news outlet to take it at face value.
If they're willing to go a long with this, where else are they willing to bend?
What convinced you that it was an obvious lie?
Missing footage.
I guess that it could very well have been a suicide, but we don't have definitive proof of that, and to act like we do is irresponsible.
It may not be a direct lie, but it is not the truth, at least yet.
The missing footage and obvious interest in making this dude disappear leads me to believe foul play, but I can't know that for sure.