SneerClub

1190 readers

4 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

self@awful.systems

blakestacey@awful.systems

dgerard@awful.systems

Has anyone with psychiatry training ever commented on Scott Alexander's ideas? (awful.systems)

submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by CinnasVerses@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I used to think that psychiatry-blogging was Scott Alexander's most useful/least harmful writing, because its his profession and an underserved topic. But he has his agenda to preach race pseudoscience and 1920s-type eugenics, and he has written in some ethical grey areas like stating a named friend's diagnosis and desired course of treatment. He is in a community where many people tell themselves that their substance use is medicinal and want proscriptions. Someone on SneerClub thinks he mixed up psychosis and schizophrenia in a recent post.

If you are in a registered profession like psychiatry, it can be dangerous to casually comment on your colleagues. Regardless, has anyone with relevant qualifications ever commented on his psychiatry blogging and whether it is a good representation of the state of knowledge?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Sorry not in that profession, but if somebody who is reacts, I'd also like an answer to the question of: 'if a member if one of your organisations commits suicide, claiming sexual abuse, and is not your patient, would it be unethical to claim they are crazy/cast doubts on their ability to interpret the real reality, as an basically embedded psychiatrist?'. More of a question for an ethics committee I guess.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Good point that SlateScott commented on accusations of abuse in rationalist and adjacent organizations. Would the Goldwater Rule have applied? At least there has been some reporting on those accusations but I don't know if it was on the ground or just phoning and emailing people from NYC, Chicago, or LA.

Someone with biochem, pharmacy, or psychology training could comment on some things SlateScott has written.

load more comments (3 replies)