News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
200 yards is a pretty decent shot for most people. I mean his range was a little high considering he was probably aiming for center mass, but the windage was dead center.
At 200 yards most decent shooters have a grouping of 3-4" at a long range if you have one in your area. Under pressure and with a single shot.... Not bad at all.
The nerves would be the biggest part. Windage wise at 200 yards we'd be talking about 3 inches or less left or right and less than an inch high or low if there was a steady breeze going. Guessing a bit, not knowing what rifle\ammo the shooter used. Nerves aside, I'm just saying it was something any novice shooter could do so long as they weren't standing while shooting free hand.
Anybody could have made that shit.
There's a huge difference between range and reality. The vast majority of combat casualties for infantry happen within 80 yards, which is why virtually all "assault" or battle rifles are zeroed at a hundred yards.
The vast majority of "skilled" shooters lack access to ranges that have anything over 50 yards available, let alone 100 yards. If you can reliably group 3 inches at 200 yards your probably in the top percentile of marksman in the country. Not many people hunt anymore, and most people going to shooting ranges are going for handguns or rifles zeroed at 100 yards or less.
It probably sounds strange for people who live in communities that hunt or have an avid rifle culture, but not much of the population can even safely handle a rifle anymore, let alone be accurate with one at 200 yards.
I'm not sure where you live, but you underestimate the amount of people who can shoot a rifle. Also, while you can zero a hunting rifle at 100 yards, most bullets haven't apexed yet at 100, so the bullet will continue to raise up a bit before starting to drop.
All mostly irrelevant because the first 250 yards of almost any ammo is like 3 inches from its highest to lowest point.
Basically, if you're shooting less than 250 yards and your rifle is zeroed out anywhere from 50 to 200 yards, no matter what anything else is, if you put the cross hairs directly over the target that's 200 yards out you're going to be within 3" of your mark. When aiming at anything under 300 yards that's larger than a coyote you don't really have to worry about windage (unless it's very windy) or bullet drop or leading the target or anything. Target in cross hairs and fire is all that's required. I could get a complete novice to hit a melon at 200 yards in less than 10 minutes time so long as they don't flinch while pulling the trigger.
I think you'd be surprised.... I live in Oklahoma, one of the highest gun per person populations in the US. However, this is not the norm when considering the entire US population. Only 20% of Americans live in rural areas, and not all of them regularly go out to the range. With a population nearing 350 million, only around 12 million people participate in rifle target shooting and less than that on a regular basis.
Again, have you ever taken a novice out to shoot with a hunting rifle? Most people barely understand how to zero a scope. There are only around 10 million people in the US that even hunt with rifles.
That is a huge "if" for most people....I think you are underestimating how terrible of a shot the vast majority of people are.
Right, but could you get a complete novice to cleanly take down a buck at 200 yards? Now imagine shooting at a person, and in a scenario that is likely to lead to your death or imprisonment immediately after.
Also "so long as they don't flinch while pulling the trigger" that takes a while for people to learn, and it gets a lot worse when aiming at something that's alive.
I don't think you aim for center mass in this situation. You want to get a clean kill shot. Don't give them the chance of surviving. I think he (or she) was aiming for the head and missed by a bit.
Nah, you pretty much always aim for center mass. With modern rounds you're just as likely to get a clean kill shot with center mass as you are with a head shot. Unless someone is obviously wearing a heavy plate carrier anything faster/heavier than a .223 is going to do the trick.
It's not like shooting at the range, even at 200 yards hunting deer, your nerves wreck accuracy. I can consistently group 2.5" at 200-300 yards at the range, but that doesn't transfer over even to hunting deer on family property. Most people haven't ever shot at a living animal, it makes a difference.
You should always aim for center mass if it isn't protected, but a lot of would be assassins aim for heads. No one aims for a neck.