this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
436 points (94.3% liked)

Comic Strips

19266 readers
1334 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] realitista@piefed.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yes, but not one run by the government. It is the form of collectivism that rural people see and most conspicuously use, and hence why they don't see the need for governments

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

why they don’t see the need for governments

A very generous reading. I think they couldn't care less if government is needed, unless it helps them, in which it's certainly desperately needed. Paying for a minority to get a benefit is their worse enemy though. It's all about selfishness.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

In which case, when it comes to big-city federal tax dollars paying for pork-barrel infrastructure (dams, highways, etc.) and health facilities, and disaster-relief in their little communities, most of those dollars come from city workers. THEY're not the ones paying for minorities to get a benefit ... it's the minorities!

Without Blue states, Red states would be stuck with the taxes their people are willing to pay.

[–] realitista@piefed.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well it shouldn't be surprising that someone who lives far away from everyone else doesn't care much for other people.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why would that be? You say that like everyone actively chooses where they'll be born.

[–] realitista@piefed.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Barring extreme poverty limiting your freedom of movement, I would assume people who wanted to leave rural areas to live in a city would do so. It happens quite frequently.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People in rural areas are usually poor. I would know, I left one to escape poverty. But I'm lucky I could. Almost everyone else in my family stayed for a variety of reasons and none of it is as simple as "they don't like people".

[–] realitista@piefed.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well yes I agree "given the choice" should be the caveat here.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. It took me a long time to leave honestly. It's scary to leave all your friends and family. I ultimately had an early mid life crisis and made me say fuck it and do it, but I get people choosing not to (even if it's a choice, it sometimes feels like it's not).

I both hate the idea of moving back but also think I will some day. I kind of miss my family even though they're extremely difficult to deal with a lot of the time. And I can't leave my parents out to dry when they get old, regardless of all the trauma they caused me.

[–] realitista@piefed.world 2 points 4 days ago

I understand. It's not something that's easily done even just on an emotional level. I also feel increasingly guilty not being near my parents as they get older.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but not one run by the government. It is the form of collectivism that rural people see and most conspicuously use, and hence why they don’t see the need for governments

in other words, anarchism

[–] realitista@piefed.world 3 points 5 days ago

Moving from the government to the church is really just moving from one giant organization to the other in a lot of ways. But yes, it's outside of government so I guess you could say it counts.