this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
317 points (97.9% liked)

News

32141 readers
5508 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gates’ connection to the U.S. detention and deportation machine is a company called Signature Aviation. Signature calls itself “the world’s largest network of private aviation terminals,” and it’s a linchpin in the day-to-day machinery of Trump’s immigration enforcement apparatus.

...

The private firm that holds Gates’ and the Gates Foundation Trust’s assets, Cascade Investment, increased its stake in the company to 30% in 2021, when it and two partners bought Signature outright for $4.7 billion. Human rights advocates — plane trackers and activists who keep tabs on deportation flights, as well as the aviation and logistics companies profiting from them — say Gates’ stake in Signature is at odds with his humanitarian work, including the Gates Foundation’s support of a plethora of immigration-focused nonprofits. Without FBOs like Signature, they say, Trump’s mass deportation agenda would be stuck on the ground.

Gates himself has not publicly commented on Signature Aviation’s crucial role in servicing ICE Air flights. Neither the Gates Foundation nor Cascade Asset Management Company, which oversees Cascade Investment, responded to multiple requests for comment.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250910112339/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bill-gates-trump-ice-signature-aviation_n_68acd96fe4b0d17ae21e7ec4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 185 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Bill Gates has been working very hard since he retired to make himself look like a nice old man doing good around him spending his money on philanthropy.

But here's the truth: the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation makes more money through its investments than it disburses through philanthropy, and its tax-exempt status is used by Bill Gates as a vehicle for tax evasion.

Just like all rich fucks' foundations incidentally: if you ever wondered how comes so many of those psychopaths do philanthropy, that's why. They don't give a damn about their fellow man. If they did, they'd pay their fair share of taxes for the good of everybody instead of cherry-picking a few high-profile causes that make them look good. Billionaires philanthropy is all about tax evasion.

And now this.

Make no mistake: Bill Gates today is just as disgusting an individual as you remember him to be when he was running Microsoft.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

And this whole bilkuonaire philanthropy thing is bullshit to begin with. How come one single man gets to focus a shot ton of resources on a single cause he deems worthy? Why not just pay taxes and let the people choose?

[–] ater@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The Gates Foundation paid for my town's shiny new rural hospital, bringing in multiple MRI machines, a PET scanner, etc to make it one of the most advanced hospitals in the region.

But the hospital can't afford to staff radiologists, so the machines are useless. Last year they sat around hemming and hawing for several hours while my husband was laying there with symptoms of a stroke, trying to decide whether it would be faster (let's be real, the debate was cheaper) to call in a radiologist or transport him to another hospital (they ended up picking the latter).

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 19 points 22 hours ago

This is why philanthropy is worse than just taxing and spending.

Huge sums of money from rich people going toward "charitable causes" can be have negative consequences. Ex.

  • The money can be spent wastefully or stupidly, like in your example.
  • The money can be used corruptly. It could be rewarding friends, buying power, or simply redirect other funds toward other business interests of the donor.
  • Destructive to established systems. Allocating money to X can shift high value employees or entire industries away from Y.
  • The money could suddenly just go away if the billionaire favors another pet project or something else.
[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, the philanthropy is still controlled by rich guys and spent for what they want, not what's needed. They might be doing some good but not in a democratic way. They still hold all the power

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

And in a way that makes people believe that they're doing good and that we can trust the billionaires to have society's best interests at heart. They're laundering their image while continuing to enrich themselves.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its painful to think how many people kept praising Gates and defending him over the years. He has his greedy little fingers in everything. Kurzgesagt has a bunch of questionable episodes and whenever people pointed out their ties to Gates they were called schizo conspiracy theorists.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago

Adam Conover did an episode of his podcast talking to Amy Schiller about this exact thing: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4UenwOIb6jE

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, I wish I could argue against this. But the cynicism seems more inflated in me every day

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Nah. Cynicism would be me saying the Gates Foundation does good, and you saying mostly to Gates.

But you're simply acknowledging what's obvious to anybody who knows anything about how the rich keep themselves rich at the expense of everybody else. That's realism, if anything.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

He does work hard to maintain an image that fools most Murcans. ABAB All Billies Are Bastards.