this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
263 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16722 readers
1468 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Will this be like viagra? Where it starts off with one purpose but the main side effects end up as the desired ones?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It doesn't say explicitly that this happened to BOTH boobs. It's entirely possible that this only happened to one of them.

[–] Handsomest_Robot@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The paper includes images of the patient and specified it was bilateral.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

So just give them the shot in the other arm next time. Duh.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Occurrence is too low. One day their will be a way to inject a boob growth drug, among other "enhancements".

If that comes first or "bespoke babies" with gene editing comes first is a coin toss.

One day small boobs will be uncommon and I find that unfortunate.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 28 points 6 days ago

I doubt that. There are both men and women who prefer small.

What might happen, is that whatever cultural ideal becomes contemporary, is also what most people will opt for, but that won't mean people on the fringes of the bell curve stop existing.

I find it more likely that if big breasts become "easy" to get, the ideal will simply shift to something else, as the rarity is part of the appeal.

If a trait becomes common, at least some portion of people lose interest.

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

re: gene editing

Ummm what kind of deranged psycho would sit in a doctors office and specify:"I want my daughter to have huge tits!"

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 29 points 6 days ago

Sitting US President, probably.

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 22 points 6 days ago

A mom that grew up with small ones. Ladies traumatize each other for that.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Have you met humanity? Once it is introduced, it will take two generations before it is common.

I don't think that that many women want bigger boobs. I have more friends who dislike having big boobs vs small boobs.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

We already have drugs that increase breast size, they just have the primary purpose/drawback of inducing lactation.

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Speak for yourself

turns around with massive cans