this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
632 points (94.0% liked)

memes

17365 readers
2162 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I once thought a service like YouTube would bypass the stupid censorship rules of even basic cable TV (which are looser than broadcast TV in the US). Oh how wrong I was.

[–] fuckgod@feddit.online 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tbf, "unalive" is only a thing because of TikTok, unless they're pushing the same content to both platforms, when they have to go with the most restrictive version of their combined rules.

And even then most of the problem is keeping it monetized, not necessarily the platforms during it down directly.

But since videos are a career now, it's a fairly effective ban on certain words.

TikTok is way way waaaay too picky imo. Personally I don't want anything censored at all, for any reason.

Unless someone is going ham on a topic that's triggers you into some PTSD situation, I don't really think there's a good argument for censorship to exist in any form at all.

If some idiot is using language you don't like you just stop listening to them and realize that when you're scrolling through an non-curated source of content, you will hear idiots saying stupid shit.

But the action taken on them shouldn't be an effective gag, it should be just getting ignored. Once blocked and ignored enough, it's basically a shadow ban. It wouldn't be profitable for them to be offensive just for the sake of being offensive, but they shouldn't be getting what basically amounts to fines just because they said someone "died"or got "killed".

That kinda shit is bonkers.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Unalive” and others on tiktok aren’t even enforced. People believe that the algorithm will like it better if they do it but there are tons of very popular videos with cursing and “killed.” I think it’s the viewers swiping away (affecting the algorithm) and the creators voluntarily censoring themselves that created this.

[–] fuckgod@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago

I've never been on TikTok, but I've heard creators that do both mention that doing so is because of TikTok rules.

Fuck censors.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're welcome to host such a platform. Won't be easy to keep it running without funding though.

[–] fuckgod@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 1 week ago

Why would the absence of capitalism suddenly make it viable to host such a platform?

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cable doesn't have rules, other than each corporate entity's own practices of what they're willing to publish/broadcast. Part of it is appeasing advertisers, and some of it is them wanting to gain market share, but it's all business reasons. And those same business reasons apply to websites and podcasts.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

It has rules in the exact same way that YouTube does.