this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
1186 points (99.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

1557 readers
494 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 77 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, but if these people were truly masters of long-term thinking, they wouldn't be spending all their time ruining the economies upon which their wealth is predicated.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 66 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You say that, but if you have a large cache of cash, economic crashes are just opportunities to buy assets at a bargain.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Up to a point yes. However, if the majority of your 'wealth' is not liquid and bound up in a stockmarket that no longer exists, you're going to have a hard time leveraging it. Similarly, what liquid wealth you have is only as valuable as the form it takes. Your dollar bills in a hyper-inflationary scenario is going to have more values as toilet paper than as a means of exchange, and your gold is no good if there are no one around willing to exchange anything for it. You can eat gold, but the nutritional value is somewhat dubious.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's why I specified having cash, and buying assets.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

they get millions in cash per week

But that econony they keep treating like a pinata actually does things. Or did. Like, it was for something.

They need to be found and taxed.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They're so busy building survival bunkers....

[–] guy@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I fully approved of this. Then just cement over all the exits when they have closed the hatches and forget about them

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All one would have to do is find the air filtration vents.

[–] guy@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Cement is less complicated.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

I was thinking community toilet

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think it's very civic-minded of them to hole up in a static position so we know where to find them.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

50% they're going to leave for mars because it's a tax-free haven.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be opposed to that outcome either.