this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
1393 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

16621 readers
792 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Making it easy was the mistake, the internet was great when knowing what tcp/ip actually is was a barrier to entry.

Gatekeeping isn't a dirty word.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This also exposed just how many stupid people are out there. We all assumed that making infinite knowledge available would be the rising tide which lifts all boats; instead, the rising tide is a tsunami of idiocy and willful ignorance.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

I know that I was completely wrong in this regard. You know, like how Mark Twain said something like travel was anathema to bigotry.

So, I thought that the reason bigotry existed was that people are afraid of the unknown, so if you forced people together, they'd have to realize that we're all the same.

But now I realize that the main reason bigotry exists is that people are staying in contact with other bigots. The part about meeting diverse people is important, but far less important than pulling people out of their comfort zone to combat bigotry. So, the internet amplifies bigotry, because they'll never be out-of-contact with their local bigots, even if they travel away from them.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can we please just make network that has a higher barrier to entry than spending 1000 dollars on an iPhone but through a 4 year loans?

And before some c suite fuck head reads this, I don't mean cost more money. I mean cost just a tiny bit more intellectually.

[–] bigchungus@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we not already on such a network? There are some here that moan about the Fediverse being too hard of a concept for the laymen to wrap their heads around. I do not disagree with them, but I like to see it as a moron filter that doesn't seem to exist on most other places on the internet.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

I mean, I just went to a site and made an account.

Facebook has the same barriers in place, and ironically enough, I can view our content without an account and not theirs.

[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

I mean, a lotta fucking Nazis knew what TCP/IP was back in the 80s, too.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this would would only help our sanity, the stupid people would still be stupid, just not as loudly

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Them being stupid, loudly, together, is making all of them stupider as individuals, too.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The ad populum fallacy on full display.

I don't know, man. I saw a Facebook poll saying ad populum isn't a thing.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

In this regard, I absolutely have come to agree.

I always say: "The Internet should be for anyone! But it shouldn't have been for everyone ."