this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
254 points (98.1% liked)
Fuck AI
3976 readers
216 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The problem is not the mix up, because of the same name or a similar appearence, but rather that the processing done by the authorities with support of AI cannot be intervened by humans. Imagine you can resolve something only after you have been fined or, worst case scenario, booked into jail.
Look, I hate the intrusion into our lives of unaccountable computer systems as anyone. But this article has nothing to do with facial recognition or AI. It's a bureaucratic fuck up.
Manchester City Council don't even own or operate any facial recognition equipment at this point. Greater Manchester Police do, but they've only purchased it a month or so ago (after this story even unfolded) and they've only deployed it a couple of times so far and only at mass events. And Greater Manchester Police aren't the issuing body of the fixed penalty notice.
Conflating genuine human and computer errors with AI just makes us look like crazy people shouting at clouds.
You got a source on ai being used? This article doesn't mention it.
You think someone in a city 200 miles away just watched video footage and was like "Yes i know that guy, his name is Steve Jones" ???
No obviously the fuck not. They clearly use facial recognition to identify people and it picked the wrong guy.
AI isn't mentioned, facial recognition isn't mentioned. You're just making up stuff for FUD.
Most of these tickets are on the spot fines. They probably just spoke with the offender who gave his name.
so you think a human saw the footage and somehow knew who this guy was?
The footage is not used to identify the offender it is used in evidence by a court. It works like this, a litter enforcement officer sees you drop litter, they get it on video as evidence, and they approach you and issue a fine. You give them your name, that's how they get it. If you don't give your name, it's a criminal matter and they call the actual police.
well that is clearly not what happened here as the person fined was not the person filmed
so again I ask you, how do you think the fine wound upein the hands of a person that was not even there?
They took the offender's name and DOB, looked up the name on whatever database they prefer - probably the electoral register, and then sent the fine to that address WITHOUT checking the DOB matched.
There no need to insert face recognition or ai to explain an administrative error.
And for the record I'm not defending ai or face recognition. I think, probably like most people on lemmy, that we need to be vigilant against digital surveillance and the authoritarianism it could very easily enable.
However, this is almost certainly not AI or face recognition and railing against it is wasting energy that could be better spent elsewhere. Instead of contributing to a cause it's undermining it. It's FUD.
fair enough, thanks for your response
You’re just making shit up at this point.