Before the Dawn (2019) is, without exaggeration, the worst film I’ve ever seen—and for one giant reason: it’s pedophile apologia.
Yes, the script is laughably bad, the performances are wood stiff, and the whole thing reeks of self-importance. But what really makes it irredeemable is how brazenly it romanticizes statutory rape.
Look at the poster. The framing is a giant red flag: a classroom, a chalkboard, students in their desks—then front and center, a teacher in a low-cut red top pressing forehead-to-forehead with a teenage boy. The film isn’t hiding its subject matter. It’s flaunting it.
And in case you think this is going to be a hard look at a predatory teacher? Nope. The movie bills itself as romance. A tale of “forbidden love.” Complete with sex scenes between a grown adult woman and a student the script explicitly identifies as a child. His own mother calls him that on screen. She’s the lone character sounding alarms, yet even she never calls the cops.
What’s worse is how the movie spins the teacher. She’s not written as a manipulative abuser—she’s painted as a tragic victim of fate, a woman who “just can’t deny her feelings.” But everything she does is textbook predator behavior. She initiates the flirtation. She arranges secret after-school sessions. She isolates him from peers. That’s not chemistry. That’s grooming.
Then comes one of the most revolting narrative choices: she’s raped by another teacher, a jealous colleague. But instead of being treated with the horror it deserves, the assault is basically used to reposition her as the damsel so her student can rush in as a white knight. She’s still framed as sympathetic, while the student’s abuse is reframed as noble love.
And here’s the kicker: lead actress Alana de Freitas didn’t just star as the teacher. She wrote the screenplay. Which makes the whole thing reads like wish fulfillment. The teacher is styled as an almost flawless archetype, her only “sin” being that she “follows her heart.”
The reception is equally nauseating. It sits at 5.8 on IMDb—above average. Read the reviews and you’ll see people praising it as “taboo romance” or “forbidden fruit.” Some even root for the characters to stay together.
Festivals went further. LA Femme International Film Festival nominated it for Best Feature Film. Boston International and Focus International both did likewise. Why on earth are professional festivals handing trophies to what amounts to pedophile propaganda?
Let’s be honest. If the genders were reversed, there would have been outrage. The movie would’ve been buried. Instead, Before the Dawn got distribution through Indie Rights, found its way onto Apple TV, Roku, and Pluto TV, and even snagged a write-up in American Cinematographer—where the DP proudly talks about building rain rigs out of Hudson sprayers and bouncing light off a king-sized bedsheet. Microbudget quirks shouldn’t eclipse the fact that what they were lighting was a sex scene between a teacher and her student.
This gets to the bigger problem: society’s double standard when it comes to female sexual predators. When the abuser is an attractive blonde, too many people celebrate it. “Boys should be grateful,” they say. Grateful that someone with authority over them coerces them into sex? Call it what it is: rape.
And this isn’t some obscure edge case. Google “female teacher charged with sexual assault” and you’ll see fresh arrests almost every week. Women abusing boys. Women abusing girls. These are predators with direct access to children, and somehow movies like Before the Dawn end up celebrating them.
Some defenders try to split hairs, calling this ephebophilia instead of pedophilia. But ephebophilia isn’t even a recognized clinical diagnosis. The law is crystal clear: anyone under the age of consent is a child. Which makes this predatory behavior. Full stop.
Normally, I’d link to streaming platforms so you can judge a film for yourself. Not this time. Before the Dawn disgusts me too much. It’s out there on major corporate platforms, which in itself is damning—they’ll happily profit off a film that romanticizes teacher-student rape, as long as the predator is a pretty woman.
@movies@piefed.social

Using language correctly is important when trying to convey a message without it being misunderstood, which is why it's necessary to specify the difference between paedophilia (prepubescent), hebephilia (early stage adolescent), and ephebophilia (mid-late stage adolescent), and medical guidelines differ among states and countries. There is a clinical differentiation in my country.
Regardless, others prefer the term Minor Attracted Person/s or MAP. This at least solves any quandary regarding terminology.
Pretty sure they're just pedophiles with a thesaurus.
If used correctly, it is rather useful to point out that not all child rapists are necessarily pedophiles, meaning there's some other risk-factors. This could be useful for example during testing for high-risk positions like teachers, if those are being done.
The best way to go in my opinion is terms like "child predator" and "child rapist", similarly to how you wouldn't call rapist of an adult a "teleiophile", a term for people attracted to adults. 100% accurate.
The guy who made that term was a pedophile trying to make a form of pedophilia acceptable.
Okay. Let's walk you through this.
What's your definition of pedophile/pedophilia?
I'm not going to listen to a pedophile try and "walk you through this" and get me to start using the term "MAPs". The only people encouraging the use of that term are pedophiles and apoligists so which are you?
Then don't. I'm not a pedo I just don't falsely equate a mental illness to child rape.
If someone has murderous fantasies, with the constant urge to murder—and has obsessive ideations thereof—we don’t tolerate it. We recognize it for what it is: a serious danger to the safety of others.
No amount of euphemisms, rebranding, or “destigmatization” talk changes the fact that these thoughts, when nurtured and indulged, put people at risk.
Same is true with pedophilia. The line is clear: it requires intervention, treatment, and strict boundaries. Not indulgence, not romanticization, and certainly not online communities that frame it as an “identity.”
That's not true actually. Society has to know about it first. Edit: additionally, having a thought of wanting to kill someone is different than obsessive ideations. Same thing with pedophilia (or really any sexual attraction) being attracted to something doesn't mean you wanna rape it.
I agree. It's a mental illness.
Once again: when someone says, “I have a craving to shoot up a school,” the right thing to do is contact the police to prevent a mass murder from occurring.
And when someone says, “I have an urge to have sex with a minor,” you likewise do the same thing.
It is better to prevent a crime than to wait for one to happen.
Yes I know. I am not advocating or whatever for people to ignore child predation. Where did you get that idea?
Tell me yours. Anything other than “a sexual predator of people below the age of consent” gets you banned.
"Someone who is attracted to the prepubescent human body and/or minors in general"
You should really read up on studies of how many child predators are pedophiles (or the other two). If I remember correctly its around 1/5 to 2/5ths. Most of the time predators target children because its vulnerable.
BTW treating Pedos and child predators as a 1:1 relationship gives child predators a way to rationalize their behavor. Generally the logic follows "I'm not a pedo" -> "I'm not a child predator" because "I just like [this one child]"
It doesn’t matter if they’re pre-pubescent or otherwise. What matters is that all minors cannot legally consent.
Ergo, anyone who acts upon this attraction is a sexual predator. Specifically, a pedophile.
And just to be clear, this is not up for debate.
Did you delete my comment?
Nope, if I delete your comment, I will tell you.
Alright. My instance has some weird issues with showing me my own stuff.
Also I didn't ask your opinion.
You didn’t ask my opinion, but since I mod this community, I very much want to know yours. 🙂
Huh. Mod status doesn't seem to federate between Piefed and Lemmy
I don’t give a damn about how pedophiles prefer to be addressed.
Also, we don’t welcome pedophile apologists in this community so you’re banned.
Being pedantic about terms is apologia? lol. lmao even.
It ain’t pedantry. They’re weasel words cooked up to wallpaper what people are: pedophiles.
And I’m banning anyone who engages or supports such nonsense.
👏👏👏 good work
Since the topic of the movie seems to be the acceptability of someone actually abusing a minor, doesn't seem like it should really matter the specifics of their pathology or internal feelings. The word 'molester' would be a more relevant catch-all term here.
You need your hard drive raided