United Kingdom

5413 readers

257 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

-4

JK Rowling slams Graham Linehan’s arrest at Heathrow (www.heraldscotland.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Neeson was judged not to have met the threshold for inciting violence despite describing in detail how he planned and attempted to carry out a racially motivated attack. In my opinion that's a more specific incitement to violence than the Linehan tweet because it is specific and credible.

Yes, he throw in a few comments about how he regrets it and won't do it again but we're talking about the contents of a statement as opposed to the context.* I'm not convinced either situations should be considered incitement to violence but the Neeson one seems closer to satisfying the criteria for police intervention.

*The law would consider the statements in isolation, like I can't go on a misogynistic/homophobic/racist rant and then add "just kidding" at the end to escape any repercussions.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, he throw in a few comments about how he regrets it and won’t do it again

it had been 40 years since it happened, i think we’d know by now if he wasn’t sincere

When asked if he would have had the same reaction if his friend’s rapist was a white man or another race, Neeson said “definitely.” “I would have had the same effect,” the actor said. “I was trying to show honor, to stand up for my dear friend in this terrible medieval fashion. I am a fairly intelligent guy. That’s why it kind of shocked me when I came down to earth after having these terrible feelings. Luckily no violence occurred. I did want to lash out because my friend was brutally raped and I was defending her honor. It was a learning curve.”

It’s pretty relatable for a lot of people, you get so angry or emotional you do something you regret is the gist of it, not some request to go out and beat up black people

on the other hand lineman said:

"if a trans-identified male is in a female-only space, he is committing a violent, abusive act".

"Make a scene, call the cops and if all else fails, punch him in the balls," he said.

punch transgender women in the balls if they don't get out of the female bathroom

so yeah there’s a bit of a difference there i think

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It wasn't really framed as a learning experience when he intially brought it up. For some reason he thought it would be an appropriate story to tell to sell his "hard man" credentials as promo for an upcoming action movie role.