this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
591 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

8135 readers
809 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

actual fraud or people sending money to someone they should have known better than to send money too?

[–] jve@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

a platform that let's someone's unique I'd change and then someone else use that same id

[–] jve@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

a platform that let's someone's unique I'd change and then someone else use that same id

Huh. Why would you think this would be either necessary or sufficient for “real fraud?”

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because in any other scenario, the "fraud" can be attributed to user error? I'm not the guy you're replying to but that's what makes sense.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can it ?

Is it user error to fall for a bait and switch?

Is it user error if have somebody steals your identity and wrecks your credit?

In the context of the platform used being responsible for the vulnerability, yes. If you fall for a bait and switch, you fell for it. Nobody else. And while identity theft doesn't always involve duping the persom whose identity you're stealing specifically, in the context of this conversation it's also due to user error.