this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
522 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

17946 readers
1544 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You could go with a more strict gun regulations. Coupled with more help for vulnerable people. And free mental healthcare.

I'm skeptical any of this would be more than a bandaid solution, a large part of the problem has got to be how highschool in the US is just inherently a miserably dehumanizing experience.

[–] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do not accept perfection as an enemy of progress!

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If "progress" here means drugging students to tolerate their circumstances, or holding the threat of pepper spray drones over them (doubt this will stay limited to active shooter scenarios), I think it might be progress in the wrong direction.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they meant that the gun regulation, help and free healthcare would be progress, not so much the drugs and the drones.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I guess that makes sense. It just frustrates me that the scope of the discussion is all solutions that would not help directly with any problems potentially murderously suicidal teens have in their lives, the growth of those problems which you might imagine is the reason this has become a trend, but instead basically just preventing them from responding destructively.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

You're right there. Yes.