this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

C++

2101 readers
1 users here now

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] entwine@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think you're conflating regular auto use with using it as a return type/argument. The latter is syntactic sugar for declaring a template. It isn't any less "documented" than doing a template<class ReturnType>....

[โ€“] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

Having the return type name is absolutely better documented. But I guess were splitting hairs because its a hard typed language and lexers can find what it is anyway.