this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
517 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

17897 readers
1574 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 156 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is such a tricky subject.
You could go with a more strict gun regulations. Coupled with more help for vulnerable people. And free mental healthcare.
Or.
MUTHERFUDGING DRONES, bitches.

It's such a tricky subject. So tricky.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This isn't tik tok you can say Motherfucking.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In fact I'd prefer if people just used the actual cuss words. Self-censoring is such a bullshit. Social media is a plague on our species.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I need more things to have a block censorship option. Like streaming music services often have a ‘block explicit’ option. I want a ‘block censored’ option.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

YouTube has a thing where if you're on data and not wifi, they will not let you watch explicit videos even if you're signed into your account, which may or may not be old enough to drink, itself.

You have to do a thing in your phone's connection settings and hook it to a specific DNS (like "dns.adguard.com", which allows you to play mobile games while connected to a network without any ads)

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Why are you lying online?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

It is a plague but not because you can't swear.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

man I made an account just to go troll idiots and holy shit is their moderation ever so fucking bad

people can say "I would drive over them" about people crossing a bridge, but if you say, "I'd drive over you tbh", nope, not okay.

not to mention the dumb automatic word filters regardless of context

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

do we have to have this same argument every godsdamned thread?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Argument? Nah. Just trying to help someone who seems to need help in forcefully expressing themselves.

just, i'm tired boss. no one likes being the language police, no one like being language policed. just let people talk.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but which of those options will make more money for the people in charge?

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Are the drones flown by AI? ...looks like there's even more money to be made!

🤢

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You could go with a more strict gun regulations. Coupled with more help for vulnerable people. And free mental healthcare.

I'm skeptical any of this would be more than a bandaid solution, a large part of the problem has got to be how highschool in the US is just inherently a miserably dehumanizing experience.

[–] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do not accept perfection as an enemy of progress!

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If "progress" here means drugging students to tolerate their circumstances, or holding the threat of pepper spray drones over them (doubt this will stay limited to active shooter scenarios), I think it might be progress in the wrong direction.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they meant that the gun regulation, help and free healthcare would be progress, not so much the drugs and the drones.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I guess that makes sense. It just frustrates me that the scope of the discussion is all solutions that would not help directly with any problems potentially murderously suicidal teens have in their lives, the growth of those problems which you might imagine is the reason this has become a trend, but instead basically just preventing them from responding destructively.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You're right there. Yes.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The drones, stored in secure boxes on campus, can be deployed within five seconds of silent panic buttons being activated. The devices—operated remotely by a team in Texas—provide constant live video feeds to first responders and, in some cases, fire nonlethal projectiles to delay or incapacitate an assailant.

To me, these aren't a bad idea. Immediate response and non-ISH-lethal. They are simply the progression of enforcement technology.

What they are not, is a solution to school shootings. They are not even a bandaid. Some people (law makers) just don't seem to know what "prevention" means.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You said

To me, these aren’t a bad idea.

and yet you also said

The devices—operated remotely by a team in Texas

in the very same post.

I wouldn't want some bored trigger happy gun nutjob from Texas playing shoot the bad guys with pepper spray on a games console where my kids and their multi ethnic friends are the NPCs.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 day ago

That's a fair assessment. I'm guessing it's that way because that's where the company that operates this is. Which, now that I think about it, probably is a poor way to manage the whole program.

So I'll post-edit to say: "with local pilot and oversight"

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~nonlethal~~ less lethal

Understandable, common typo in MY GUNS! land.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

stored in secure boxes on campus, can be deployed within five seconds of silent panic buttons being activated

So much about that sentence doesn't make sense though...

"secure boxes" but "a button can open them" also "silent panic" with "drones out within 5 seconds"

In any event, the 'nonlethal' is generally considered a bad descriptor versus 'less than lethal', unless they are talking about something merely mildly annoying rather than the usual things like rubber or bag rounds.