this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
2831 readers
341 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
OK, but a VPN packet in practice looks exactly the same as the next. There’s literally zero difference in a “business VPN” packet vs any other, which is my point. The courts literally cannot differentiate.
Why do the courts need to differentiate VPN packets? They will just say "uhm, Mozilla, your public VPN product that is offered for purchase in the UK is not compliant with the Online Safety Act. Change it or we'll fine you one miillllion dol..pounds.".
Not saying I like it, but the idea that they can't do it is silly. And there are increasing levels of "China" that they can go to it they way:
Don't imagine that they can't become China for technical reasons. The only thing holding them back is politics and it isn't doing a good job of that.
Right, but what stops you and I from using a VPN? Your logic is sound from the provider point of view - but I can set up my own VPN quickly and cheaply. So for me the end user nothing has changed as far as I can see it.
And if anyone asks? Oh Im just using
Step 3 stops you from doing that.
Also I don't think you can set up a VPN very easily. If you're thinking of using a VPS, apparently they are mostly blocked by major sites.
Best you can do is domain fronting with VPN over HTTPS but China can even block that based on traffic analysis.
“Block all VPN connections”
OpenVPN packets can be disguised to look like regular non-VPN packets. This won’t stop anyone who’s mildly determined