this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
748 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

9262 readers
446 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Kids really need to be introduced to Linux earlier. None of this iPad baby shit.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Get them a raspberry Pi or equivalent for Christmas and teach them how to run a Minecraft server on it

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Necessity is the breeder of invention

I cringe at parents who build there kids gaming PCs. They should just give their kids "junk" and let them figure it out.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

I mean a gaming PC is awesome but getting some old garage sales PC and spending an afternoon and showing them how to build a website would be awesome.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Specifically, kids ought to be using Raspberry Pis. Linux + a bunch of other stuff designed to help them learn about computers, including an actual goddamn book ("Raspberry Pi Beginners Guide") if you buy a Raspberry Pi 500 (the built-into-a-keyboard version).

[–] QuadDamage@kbin.earth 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Raspberry Pis these days are overpriced, a cheaper mini PC/old Optiplex will do fine.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Mini PCs / old Optiplexes don't have built-in GPIO and a huge database of kid-friendly projects to do with them.

It's that software and community and hacker ethos built into the design that makes the difference, not the performance specs of the hardware. The point is "facilitating kids learning about computing," not merely "being a desktop computer."


I mean, I guess you could install Raspberry Pi OS on a PC and add a GPIO breakout board (like this or this) to try to replicate the pedagogical experience of a Raspberry Pi without the "overpriced" hardware, but it's not going to be nearly as straightforward as just using a real Pi.

[–] QuadDamage@kbin.earth 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Used enterprise minis are dirt cheap. The only downside is that they guzzle electricity compared to a low spec pi, but they can do much more, so don’t be afraid to give them additional tasks.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My Dell SFF uses close to the same power as my Pi, once you start doing anything with the Pi (like swap to an SSD instead of an SD card). Pi idle: 8w. Dell SFF: 12w. Neither one show up on my power bill. Both of those are less than a single LED light bulb.

Pi is great on power at idle, with nothing else going on. But it can't convert videos at a reasonable pace, doesn't come in a case with mounts, extra power, etc.

Don't get me wrong, Pi is great, it's been fun tinkering with it, a great learning tool. But it's hard to compete with a mini or SFF on a capability-per-watt basis or physical capability (standard brackets, expansion, etc).

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Those are heavy LED bulbs you got there at 12W or more. Typically LED bulb is only like 3 - 5 W??

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Honestly they don't burn that much power but it will depend on the CPU

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I personally wouldn't buy a Raspberry Pi. Instead, give them a old computer and say "have at it"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

See my other reply expanding on why Raspberry Pi specifically.

Otherwise, while your strategy worked when I was a kid -- back in the DOS/early Windows days we had to actually figure out how stuff really worked out of necessity, and often without help from the Internet because we weren't online yet -- those days are gone. The expectations of easiness are too high now, and kids would just get frustrated and bitch about wanting to go back to a "just works" tablet or phone instead. They really need some additional killer feature to be excited about, that they can't get with a generic device running a web browser, in order to be motivated to explore.

My kids have Raspberry Pi 400s but are too young to get into reading the guide book that came with them yet, so even under (what I consider to be) those ideal circumstances they mostly ignore all the local software and just try to play the web-based games they found out about from school. 😕

In other words, even a Raspberry Pi isn't a guarantee of fostering real computer literacy, but I still think it gives the best chance (better than a generic old PC, and way better than a consumption-oriented tablet/phone).

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Don't take this the wrong way but sound like a grumpy old millennial.

You don't need DOS or a Raspberry pi to learn tech. What you need is the right mindset and a desire to tinker. If your kid is "bitching" they simply don't care to learn about tech. Don't force it down their throat as that is not going to end well.

They are interested they will learn by simply tinkering and playing around. You should avoid giving them guidance as that doesn't teach critical thinking. Let them figure out how to do whatever. It might be improving the frame rate in Minecraft or it could be doing some sort of programming project. It could even end up being desktop customization or digital art.

I also think it is perfectly reasonable to tinker with a mobile device or tablet. You can do all sorts of things especially with some of the apps from F-droid such as Termux.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I think we need more open less harmful mobile platforms. Mobile devices are perfectly fine but the ads and tracking can be a very serious problem.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You’re describing a sturdy tablet running Linux. Speaking of which, I just remembered the worst gift I have ever been given, a gen1 windows surface! The sack of shit couldn’t even run windows, the OS it was designed for, without freezing. Gonna see if I can dig it out and swap the OS!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Linux sucks on mobile

I wish it didn't but in 2025 that is the state of things

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And it seems like android sucks on there as well. Damn.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is far better than anything else.

It isn't ideal what Google is doing. However, Lineage OS and other ROMs are keeping the ecosystem alive. We also have F-droid which is great.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Eh, it’s just not worth the effort to get a tablet that will still run poorly even after poring over half deleted xda threads. Were there any chance that the original surface running another OS could be useful, I’d do it. But it’d be a poor experience no matter what, based on what I’ve read.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh hell yes get them off these crappy mobile devices

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Yup, every time my niece and nephew come over I show them how awesome my desktop is! They also use my laptop but I want them to know what a proper PC can do.

Next up is showing them that the files they download don't just magically disappear into the ether on their device.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think mobile devices aren't all bad.

Honestly the biggest issue is the exposure to marketing

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The biggest issue is the surveillance capitalism, monopolization, and walled gardens/firmware that prevent linux mobile options from becoming a viable alternative.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Android is perfectly fine. I've even seen people do crazy things with iOS.

Kids will use whatever they have available if they have the right mindset. You can do some crazy things on mobile.

Me: Junior! Did you hack a Gibson???

5yo: Maaayyybe...

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

iPads are technically BSD, not Linux.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Don't forget the Mach heritage! Darwin is the mutt of kernels.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

Technically, Android is Linux (but not GNU/Linux), but as @grue@lemmy.world mentioned, i(Pad)OS is based on BSD ("Darwin"), a UNIX derivate.
Both are unixoid systems.