this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
575 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

17834 readers
1310 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Solving it in his state is certainly a good way of spearheading a national solution.

As for you considering the statement racist: I was expecting a lot worse based on the headline. I don't think grouping by race when looking at health statistics is inherently racist. Race can be relevant to health outcomes, among other reasons due to racism, and so one should be allowed to discuss that.

Deciding to ignore the problem because it predominantly affects a certain race is racist, but that wasn't what was stated in the quote earlier in this thread, despite the headline suggesting it was.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Except adjusting for race is not appropriate. They are a significant portion of his constituent population. It may help explain a factor as to why it's higher in his state. But I'll bet being in a red state is also a factor given things like doctors fleeing, budget cuts, etc.

Additionally, such stats are prone to reflecting biases in the system rather than actual medically relevant information. Do black women have worse outcomes because of biological reasons, or because they are treated worse. This is one of those stats you have to be careful with because a nontrivial amount of time, it's damn near proof of racism.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's appropriate if you follow up with investigations for the reasons that is happening and look for solutions to correct that. Other than, "Have you tried not being poor?" of course.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Correct, I just don't feel like pretending that that's a thing they might do and that it isn't the racism causing the problem.