Not The Onion

17834 readers

1310 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

575

Louisiana Senator: Our Maternal Death Rates Are Only Bad If You Count Black Women (www.vanityfair.com)

submitted 1 day ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

but the article is 3 years old.

So you think he has learned from his mistakes and improved his atrocious stance?

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Im impressed that you managed to read the second half of my comment without reading the first. The whole comment is a dozen words, so thats a real feat.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I did read it, I just found questionable as it seems you are dismissing this as too old to care

Cassidy is still a Senator and a piece of shit, so what does it matter if the racist thing he said is 3 years old?

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I literally said hes still a piece of shit, so that should answer your first question. As to "how is this not relevant?"

The article is talking about what might happen if Roe is overturned by the supreme court, and what that might mean down the line. That happened already. We are out of "might" and are several years down the line.

Lets talk about what's currently happening, now. Discussing a speculative article about changes that "may occur in the future" is pretty odd when we are 3 years in the future and can literally tell the article what happened.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago

I mean, you could have just said all that... we are not mind readers, you know?