UK Politics

4217 readers

220 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Lessons from an asylum hotel counter-protest: calling our opponents ‘fascist’ doesn’t work (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 6 days ago by FishFace@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://web.archive.org/save/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fcommentisfree%2F2025%2Faug%2F29%2Fasylum-hotel-fascist-asylum-protests-politicians

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I think you (we, people in general) need to do better than that.

Being racist isn't the same as being fascist. I don't see how you can impute fascist values in people who turn up to protest asylum seekers being housed in hotels, because where are you getting a read on their attitudes to the role of the police, military and liberty?
When people say that they're protesting asylum seekers because they represent a danger, that is based on a xenophobic or racist understanding of crime. But firstly, it's necessary to say that, because to someone who does actually believe that asylum seekers are more likely to commit crime, just replying with "that's racist" (or worse, "you're a fascist") is a non-sequitur.

It'd be like if you said that immigrants contribute positively to society compared to the native population, and someone saying you "hate British people." Obviously you don't hate British people; you're merely talking about a way in which (you believe) the immigrant population is "better" on average than British people (and no doubt you could explain the boring demographic reasons for this). This doesn't actually change if, in fact, the statistics you'd read about immigrants and the economy were wrong! So put yourself in the shoes of someone protesting asylum seekers; you have this belief which, in your opinion, warrants protesting their presence. These beliefs are amplified by sources that are respected in your circles like the papers. Then someone calls you racist. Do you use this as an opportunity re-examine yourself, or do you reject what they're saying because they never engaged with your actual beliefs?

Or from another angle: it's not racist to think that different populations have different, specific likelihoods of, for example, being in work, doing well in education, or committing crimes. If a press captured by racists and the right wing amplifies stories about a certain population committing crimes, people are likely to believe that that population does so disproportionately, without ever harbouring an actual hatred of that population.

If your main message to them is that this is racist, that message will fall on deaf ears, because it's not attacking the source of their beliefs.