this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
93 points (91.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34281 readers
1041 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Id like lemmings take on how they would actually reduce emissions on a level that actually makes a difference (assuming we can still stop it, which is likely false by now, but let's ignore that)

I dont think its as simple as "tax billionaires out of existence and ban jets, airplanes, and cars" because thats not realistic.

Bonus points if you can think of any solutions that dont disrupt the 99%'s way of life.

I know yall will have fun with this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You are asking two how to questions "combat climate change" and "reduce emissions"

To realistically combat climate change:

  • Admit that we need to try geoengineering (we are already doing this with all the CO~2~ and CH~4~ going into the atmosphere)
  • Weather it is SO~2~ injection or cloud seeding to artificially increase the albido; we need to reduce incident solar radiation to give us a few more decades to actually reduce emissions

To reduce emissions:

  • Tackle the biggest emissions first.
  • Electrification of the passenger fleet; that means batteries. Keep fuel cells for heavy transport (maybe)
  • Encourage electric biking. And other micro-mobility. Along with better public transport.
  • Normalise a historical style diet, meat is a treat only once or twice a week.
  • Reduce concrete construction; keep it for the important things like the foundations.
  • Reduce the practice of packaging everything in plastic; again keep it for the important things only like electrical insulation.
  • Massive ramp up of solar and wind around the world.
  • Where we use fossil fuels, ask is this important enough to use FF here?

Carbon taxes:

  • Tax CO~2~e (carbon dioxide equivalent) at a reasonable rate to encourage all of the reduction measures.
  • At less than $65NZD/T the cost is too low to encourage significant movement on the issues.
  • Have a ratcheting scheme in the CO~2~ market, i.e. add $5-8/yr/T for CO~2~e; in 10 years the price will be between $110-140/T. At the 10yr mark, make the ratchet $10-15/yr/T.
  • Add a carbon tariff; basically make it more expensive to buy from countries that are not pulling their weight.
  • Be careful not to double tax, this is important for buy in from the public. i.e. the carbon tax on fuel should be exempt from sales tax, taxing a tax is a great way to alienate people.
[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

increase the albido

My brain saw this as 'libido' for a second. I was like, you want us to fuck our way to carbon neutrality?

I was about to suggest cross-posting to imgur when I realized I merely misread the word :\

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 13 hours ago

Well it is a hypothesis that needs testing...

[–] f314@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

In your defense, it’s actually spelled “albedo”.