this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
980 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

74585 readers
3951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 82 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

That's what Android was and they keep trying to undo that any way they can

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I disagree. Google has always been a thinly veiled Microsoft. A wolf in sheeps clothing. They embrace, extend, extinguish. It's the same thing.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 41 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

We need a new one that isn't made by a for-profit company that only was good at the beginning to get total market saturation before flipping the enshittification switch to maximize those profits.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

why do we need a new one? can't android be salvaged? lots of things have been solved already in a way that makes a relatively good foundation.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

All the non-Google entities that build stuff on Android need to start banding together instead of siloing themselves. If AOSP is being closed, they need to create a non-profit replacement for it.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 7 points 7 hours ago

The fucked up part is nowadays third parties like banks or sometimes even governments make apps rely on Google services, so you can't use an ungoogled phone for stuff you actually need for life...

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

right! I never understood why isn't there more cooperation between different foss roms, at least sharing patches and coordinating some work.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I guess if Google closes down AOSP it would get forked, and the fork would probably be a separate thing from the current Android distributions. So that the landscape would continue to look a bit like today, except that AOSP would be an independent thing.

Then I guess it's possible that Google would seek to make android apps incompatible, gradually making the whole thing kinda pointless. I can't say I'm using Android for the great UX - I'm using it because it supports a few apps I continue to be forced to use. If I can't use them on Android any more I'm switching to Ubuntu Touch or PostmarketOS in a heartbeat.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Makes me curious if they think their monopoly or whatever they were called cases making them split their browser are going to go though. If you are going to have to sell parts of the company, now would be the time to hammer home any last minute bad things that would make the companies more profitable. Shows higher income for the sale, and gets it out of the way so the new purchaser doesn't look like the ones who did it, but rather the ones who will make announcements on how they will review things to make them better for the user base.

Doesn't mean they'll follow through on them, but it takes the evil and sticks it with the old owners.