this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
554 points (98.9% liked)

News

31889 readers
2885 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 32 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Yokeley approached a Wilmington police officer and claimed his two juvenile granddaughters had discovered two suspicious pills in ice cream they’d purchased from Dairy Queen

Sounds like he wasn't trying to drug them, fortunately I guess. Either way the guy is still off his rocker.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 44 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Or, he was trying to drug them and the children found the drugs, so he tried to make them think it wasn't him.

At the very least, we know he had the drugs, and we know he put them in the ice cream where they could have been consumed by his granddaughters.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 10 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Unless he never tried MDMA before I doubt it. There is no way anyone that ever tasted mdma believes you can hide it in ice cream without the child immediately spitting it out

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Let's all take a step back and recognize that this is not a man making thoughtful decisions. He put drugs in ice cream for his granddaughters. His thought process isn't likely to be anything we can fully comprehend.

Can you imagine being the parents here? "Honey, your dad slipped ecstasy into the girls' ice cream again. Could we please just go back to the Guatemalan babysitter?"

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

If the ice-cream had bits in it they might have just not chewed on it enough to recognize a pill or taste ...

I don't believe for a second he did not have the intent of drugging them... most likely had in the back of his mind if they got very ill he'd get them to a hospital and still blame what they ate.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If the ice-cream had bits in it they might have just not chewed on it enough to recognize a pill or taste

So you have also never tasted mdma. Even a tiny crumb will make you gag the second it touches your tongue

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Yeah I try to avoid ingesting unhealthy drugs :-D

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The incident is bad enough without trying to exaggerate it.

He was trying to frame people.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Kind of depends on what is sold to someone as ecstasy. If its actual crystalline MDMA then it wouldnt be in a pill. It was probably 2CB which is often sold as ecstasy even though it isnt MDMA, the effects are somewhat similar enough. 2CB is generally a large and tasteless chalky pill

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It was him. People on Dairy Queen salary don’t slip mdma into kids ice cream

However, surveillance video later revealed that Yokeley himself was seen placing the pills into both of the girls’ treats. The pills reportedly tested positive for MDMA and cocaine, as noted in an arrest warrant. The authorities said they have evidence he slipped drugs into the girls' ice cream.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like he wasn’t trying to drug them

How did you come to that conclusion?

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They mean he set up the drugs to report and create some kind of spectacle, instead of adding them to drug the grandkids.

Intended to drug the ice cream, didn't intend to let the grandkids consume the ice cream.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah about that, why not drug his own ice-cream or coffee, he'd be sure he could cause a ruckuss then. Now he planned to drug kids, "hoping" they'd notice it and taking the risk they wouldn't.

It's all very fishy.

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 20 hours ago

He has to frame it to SAVE THE CHILDREN or some such.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Intended to drug the ice cream, didn’t intend to let the grandkids consume the ice cream

Um ya, I dont buy that story at all

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I certainly wouldn't trust him either, but fact is, he told the cops about the drugs he planted.

He could've just not done that, or drugged ice cream from a tub at home, or told the kids they're sprinkles or something.

To be its pretty clear that he didn't intend to directly harm the kids, and was "just" willing to put them into a stressful situation where an accident could have resulted in harm, anyway.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How do you come to this conclusion? Comment below you got it right. He tried to drug them, they found out, he tried to save face. Him approaching the officer first does not indicate his innocence.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why would he choose those drugs if he was trying to drug them? They're stimulants.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

They're... drugs. So yes, he (intended) to drug them. Who gives a fuck what the exact composition is?

These illegal stimulants could have harmed and even killed them. He put them in their ice cream, neither they nor their parents were aware and didn't consent to consuming the pills. Even if he intended to "catch" it, a million different things could have prevented that. He gambled with those girls' lives to create a fake political enemy. If he had done that to my kids, I would have had to resist retaliating against him, and I'm not even a parent!

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm asking for his motive. I believe he put the pills in there because he wanted to make a scene about it. Not because he wanted them to ingest them. The article doesn't state how this was done, did the children ever possess the ice cream while it was contaminated? Or did he take them, plant the drugs, and head for the counter?

Either way he should have the book thrown at him for this and if there's more information out there and I'm wrong, fine but I just don't see how speculating that he intended to drug them makes sense given the facts presented in the article.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

he allegedly slipped illegal drugs into his granddaughters' ice cream.

Yokeley himself was seen placing the pills into both of the girls’ treats.

It happened. Unless the reporters received wrong information (which happens), he absolutely committed the crime, which is a felony. So no, he wasn't just "making a scene", and his intent doesn't matter, because again, those drugs could have still ended harming those children.

But I did edit my comment to clarify that he attempted to drug them, or at least there was the risk of that happening accidentally...

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

@lightnsfw@reddthat.com is making sense here. Throw the book at him and maybe have a psych eval done. Republican, so might as well check his computer for child porn.

That being said, spiking a kids ice cream with ecstasy pills makes no sense. It tastes awful, they would be hard to chew and an obvious foreign object in ice cream. If the girls didn't OD, they'd be bouncing off the walls.

I could see someone that doesn't actually know anything about drugs thinking this is a good way to frame someone. In reality, Drugs Are Really Expensive, as well as MDMA users/dealers generally not being willing to hurt children for nothing.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 14 hours ago

I read the article. Nothing about those quotes makes it clear that the ice cream was in possession of the girls after he drugged it. He could have given it to them or ordered it for them, making it "theirs", then taken it back to add the pills and make his scene. If he wanted to drug them why not just let them eat it? And why those drugs that don't produce any of the typical effects someone would want to drug someone for?