this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Ask

712 readers
117 users here now

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Posts must be legitimate questions (no rage bait or sea lioning)
  3. No spam
  4. NSFW allowed if tagged
  5. No politics
  6. For support questions, please go to !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca

Icon by Hilmy Abiyyu A.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SteposVenzny@beehaw.org 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I had an economics teacher in high school who warned us that we’re better off at the higher end of a lower tax bracket than the lower end of a higher one, because a higher bracket being a higher percentage of taxation meant you’d lose so much more money that you’d be holding less in the end until you pass the threshold within that bracket where you get back ahead of the tax. An economics teacher.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago

this is true, at least for my income tax

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago

If the tax isn't incrementing continuously but in discrete steps, this sounds kinda plausible to me... Also I know of certain hard limits in my country that will force you to suddenly pay some additional kind of taxes or loose certain privileges once you cross them.
This means that earning a single Euro more could lead to loosing hundreds or thousands in effect...