Technology

834 readers

176 users here now

Tech related news and discussion. Link to anything, it doesn't need to be a news article.

Let's keep the politics and business side of things to a minimum.

Rules

No memes

founded 3 months ago

MODERATORS

rimu@piefed.social

DOGE uploaded live copy of Social Security database to ‘vulnerable’ cloud server, says whistleblower (techcrunch.com)

submitted 13 hours ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/technology@piefed.social

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think they're indicating that "vulnerable" is the opinion of "whistleblower" and not the writer.

[–] gaybriel_fr_br@jlai.lu -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I know, but it removes credibility. It's minimising and obfuscating, essentially defending the company's version of the truth instead of the whistleblower.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You are reading the headline as if it was a comment. If it were a comment, yes the quotes make it almost seem sarcastic. But news headlines traditionally have different grammar rules and here it means it's a quote.

You can argue that the traditions are stupid but within the context of journalism, nothing is wrong with the headline

[–] gaybriel_fr_br@jlai.lu 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I am, but it does read as sarcastic and discrediting to me. You don't see quotation marks when journalists write about employees "quiet quitting" for example, so it does seem one-sided to protect the corporations.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think you would see that if the headline was directly quoting a CEO. Like

CEO of Nestle Blames "Quiet Quitting", Calls For Mandatory RTO

[–] gaybriel_fr_br@jlai.lu 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But you therefore admit any company can make any statement and if it doesn't go through the CEO it will omit the quotation marks..?

Because that's my gripe about all this, companies are given the benefit of the doubt.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No? That's not what I'm saying. The position of the quotee doesn't matter at all. Example:

Denmark summons US diplomat over Greenland ‘influence’ attempts

[–] gaybriel_fr_br@jlai.lu 1 points 8 hours ago

That article headline has exactly one claim, the 'influence' claim.

Yet there are two within the one we're talking about:

"DOGE uploaded live copy of Social Security database"

And

"Vulnerable"

Yet only the latter is in quotation marks. Selective quotation seems intentional and meant to disparage the message being spread here.