this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
1983 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9086 readers
3668 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's fine. They should be LEGALLY required to allow ME to make that call and offer an avenue to allow me to remove it all.

Nobody is saying everyone's machine MUST be completely open and insecure.

But that's a far cry from giving me no recourse to make MY hardware do what I want it to.

And before anybody screams "liability", they're going to hold you to an EULA anyway - throw a couple lines in there.

[โ€“] Chozo@fedia.io -2 points 1 week ago

Nobody is saying everyone's machine MUST be completely open and insecure.

Neither am I. I don't disagree that Google is overstepping with the restrictions they're imposing lately. It's a point I'll damn well argue, myself.

The problem I take is with the argument the OP presents, because it incorrectly suggests that the average user has (or should have) an expert-level knowledge of their devices. Safety rails exist for a reason. Yes, they're going too far; but no, removing them outright would not be the better solution.