this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
732 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

17792 readers
1974 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This isn't necessarily bloat, it's things the military needs to be able to do. Like 90% of the military is just good logistics and the ability to move resources anywhere in the world quickly. That's good for both an army on the move and helping hurricane victims.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Logistics is effectively the hardest problem and the most expensive one.

A lot of people don't realize that a lot of wasteful spending is effectively required in order to maintain any semblance or level of readiness.

If you are not manufacturing equipment, ammunition, and similar items then you have no one and nowhere to actually manufacture them. A large part of spending is keeping the people, skill sets, facilities, and supply chains running and operating at a minimum required level to support an increase in need. If you don't do this then when you need it, you can't manufacture it anymore, your entire supply chain has to start from scratch.

It's incredibly wasteful but also somewhat necessary.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. Same reasons we can't built a Saturn V any longer. All the supply chains, expertise, etc., are long gone. Imagine keeping all that up to run a B-52 Stratofortress. And yet we do it!

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

All the supply chains, expertise, etc., are long gone.

Don't deport it to El Salvador then.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

There also has to be redundancy in the supply chain for critical items. That can look like wasteful duplication to someone who doesn't understand how the process works.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like 90% of the military is just good logistics and the ability to move resources anywhere in the world quickly.

There’s an old WW2 story, where a captured Nazi officer realized they were going to lose the war… Because he overheard American officers complaining that they were running low on ice cream. Nazis at the time were eating their own boot leather while they froze to death in Russia. Meanwhile, the Americans were complaining about a lack of ice cream.

The logistics behind the American military is honestly a modern wonder. If they were willing to divert the time, manpower, and resources to do so, they could erect a fully staffed and stocked McDonalds anywhere on the globe in less than 48 hours. Imagine an entire restaurant being built in a single weekend. Now imagine it in the middle of the ocean on an oil rig, or at the North Pole. The sheer amount of resources and manpower required would be monumental by most standards, but it wouldn’t even be worth a footnote on the military’s expense report.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a fully operational mcdonalds is fully fucking useless. this is not a flex. the logistics are impressive and necessary yeah, but not for shitty overpriced burgers. that's just yay for corporate defense contracts.

You think Grunts prefer a Olive Garden?