this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
27 points (93.5% liked)
Music
10100 readers
78 users here now
↳ Our family Communities:
➰#Music
Music.world - !music@lemmy.world
Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world
Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world
Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee
Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee
Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world
Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com
60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world
70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world
80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world
90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think the gallery you describe can still fit with what he's saying, whether either of us agree with him. I would say that the gallery is not an expression of film as a medium since you're removing the fundamental components of time and motion from it. It becomes an expression of photography made with unconventional methods, I think.
In the same way that an excellent film score does not necessarily stand alone as an excellent piece of music, a frame from a movie could be absolutely perfect in its role as part of a shot but uninteresting by itself in isolation. The score wasn't intended to go without the film, just like the frame wasn't intended to go without the rest of the shot. Maybe they do turn out to be interesting by themselves but it's at least partly a coincidence if it happens