movies

1574 readers

366 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

Be civil
No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
Do not spam
Stay on topic
These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

atomicpoet@piefed.social

BoozeOrWater@piefed.social

TheImpressiveX@piefed.social

214

Was my memory wiped or was the Star Wars sequel trilogy just that forgettable? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/movies@piefed.social

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Force Awakens and its follow-ups had so few memorable characters, it’s a wonder Disney – and Oscar Isaac – are still talking about potential spin-offs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Noblesavage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd take your statement about Star Wars sequels being about death a bit further - they're about learning about the past and moving forwards (sometimes that means destroying the past to be able to move forwards).

My cousin was actually deeply affected by the sequels because the theme of the wiser, older generation passing on knowledge to a younger generation that was resistant to becoming the next leaders.

I thought the scene between Yoda and Luke in the Last Jedi perfectly captured the theme of the movies. I'll copy paste the quotes from IMDB:

Luke Skywalker: [Yoda appears as a ghost] Master Yoda.
Yoda: Young Skywalker.
Luke Skywalker: I'm ending all of this. The tree, the texts, the Jedi. I'm going to burn it all down.
Yoda: [Yoda summons lightning to burn down the tree and the Jedi texts. He laughs] Ah, Skywalker. Missed you, have I.
Luke Skywalker: So it is time for the Jedi Order to end.
Yoda: Time it is for you to look past a pile of old books, hmm?
Luke Skywalker: The sacred Jedi texts?
Yoda: Oh, read them, have you? Page-turners they were not. Yes, yes, yes. Wisdom they held, but that library contained nothing that the girl Rey does not already possess. [Skywalker, still looking to the horizon.] Never here, now, hmm? The need in front of your nose.
Luke Skywalker: I was weak. Unwise.
Yoda: Lost Ben Solo you did. Lose Rey we must not.
Luke Skywalker: I can't be what she needs me to be.
Yoda: Heeded my words not, did you? Pass on what you have learned. Strength. Mastery. But weakness, folly, failure also. Yes, failure most of all. The greatest teacher, failure is. Luke, we are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

It's definitely about relating to the past, it is a sequel trilogy after all.

And there's stuff there about how authoritarians use our relationship to the past to gain power. Kylo Ren is more of a communist type of authoritarian that wants to destroy the past. That puts him in conflict with the traditionalist authoritarians who are more in line with fascism.

Ultimately the message is that you can't ignore the past, but you also shouldn't let it dictate who you are. Ben Solo doesn't have to be like Darth Vader, Rey Palpatine doesn't have to be like the Emperor. In fact Rey doesn't need to identify with her ancestors at all, she can identify as a Skywalker. This upset a lot of people because apparently no one in Star Wars should ever change their name to indicate their alignment with good or evil? Some people are angry that "she can't be a Skywalker because she's a Palpatine" which is completely missing the point. You aren't defined by your ancestors.

So it wasn't about rejection of the past but it wasn't about conforming to the past either. So that made everyone upset.