this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
265 points (98.5% liked)

News

31889 readers
2795 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Celebrities like Taylor Swift have long used a little-known Federal Aviation Administration program to shield their private jets’ flight records from public view. Now ICE is using the program to hide information about its deportation flights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (8 children)

In the scope of things, she is. She could certainly distribute more money to her employees and go on a massive charity spree like Mackenzie Bezos, but she did gain her wealth mostly through her own work and flying a private jet is hardly the core sin of "bad" billionaires.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago (7 children)

but she did gain her wealth mostly through her own work

When there is a large music event at a stadium or similar venue, there is hundreds of people working there for the preparations and during the event. If you claim that it was still "mostly her own work", you could make that argument for any other billionaire too. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos... They all put in a lot of work and brought the "ideas". I fail to see how a stage performer should be seen different.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Sure, but do you have any evidence she's underpaying the staff? Maybe her songwriters deserve a significant share of the money, but everyone else is just doing a job, the same job they do for other acts on other nights, so just because Swift is a big name doesn't mean they should all be rich. If she's abusing them or demanding extra work and not compensating them for it, then yeah, she's a villain, but just because her lights guy isn't getting $10M for his work isn't evidence of wrongdoing.

The other rich guys you try to compare her to did small work themselves and then just rode the work of others. Most of their wealth came about long after they were doing any work critical to the result, so they're basically just investors extracting value from others contributing more effort and talent to the success than they do. Swift on the other hand is practically the whole reason anyone is paying anything. Whether you appreciate her music or not, Swift is actually irreplaceable and the primary driver of its value.

[–] earlstilt@feddit.uk 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“I defend the billionaire’s right to pay peanuts to the peasants because I see myself as a future billionaire, even though there is significantly more chance of me winning the lottery at nearly 1 in 300million than becoming a billionaire & that’s how I justify the ludicrously disproportionate distribution of the wealth generated by a Taylor Swift concert. There’s literally no benefit to me in holding this opinion, LOL”

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 days ago

do you have any evidence she’s underpaying the staff?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)