this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
175 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25335 readers
2489 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with SpaceX earlier this week, ruling that the National Labor Relations Board’s current structure is unconstitutional. The decision will keep the agency hamstrung until the case makes its way to the Supreme Court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 40 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Wait

Wait wasn't the NLRB put in place to chill unions?

Like to placate them? Like they literally armed themselves to the teeth and unions scared the shit out of owners?

Do... Does the circuit not know that or am I thinking of something else?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Does the circuit not know that or am I thinking of something else?

They just don't care. It's just like what they are doing with federal workers who can't use strikes as a collective bargaining tool. The MSPB was made to pacify federal workers and offer some sort of protection from partisan politics.

So trump just fired the board members so they couldn't make a quorum, and of course the supreme Court allowed it. They are relying on the fact that most Americans are too comfortable to risk jail time to stand up for their rights.

[–] roundup5381@sh.itjust.works 14 points 16 hours ago

Its not just jail time, its a permeant black spot on your record that signals you’ll be “trouble” to employers and law enforcement both. Its legal fees, stigma, and being perpetually viewed with suspicion. I’m just trying to say it isn’t comfort, its fear.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They don't want the placated. They want unions crushed underfoot. Trump and Co. want to bring back the days when they could use armed troops to shoot strikers and even bomb them. I'm not even joking. Trump wants a return to the robber-baron ruled gilded age.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like it's they want another fight akin to the 19th and early 20th centuries...

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

We need a few more sherifs like 'Ol Smiling Cid Hatfield.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 16 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Man that strikes me as so odd.

They live better now than the robber barons did. If we regress to such an age, their standard of living goes with it.

The only reason we have modern materials and standards is because

Well

Almost entirely because unions put the standards there.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

They have no idea what they have. No idea where it comes from.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

I don't think it's entirely about how they live. I really think it's more about the little people getting a decent wage and decent treatment. They don't want that. They want to be able to do anything they want to anyone they want and for their victims to have no recourse. They want power over the poor. The cruelty really is the point.