this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
141 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck AI

3865 readers
804 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It’s funny watching these guys making Elon Musk style promises for over 5 years and the media is finally starting to ask questions.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

Musk still has people believing Tesla can do self driving, for like 10 years now. And no one calls him out on that shit.

Altmann lies are much more destructive as the impact they will have on the economy due to executives believing this and companies will be irreparably harmed. Many will not recover depending how far they go into the rabbit hole.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 9 points 1 week ago

2010s grifting techniques are showing limits

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately this article isn’t really one of them. It spends most of its time defending the AI status quo. Ex:

. . . although Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong noted this week that the MIT report "reads like something given away on the 'research' page of a large consultancy." Its conclusions are fairly obvious, he said: People like ChatGPT for basic tasks and hate complicated enterprise systems, and companies that try to build their own AI usually fail.

The study attributes these failures to implementation problems rather than model quality. "The core issue? Not the quality of the AI models, but the 'learning gap' for both tools and organizations," Fortune wrote about the study. Purchased AI tools succeed 67 percent of the time, while internally built systems succeed only one-third as often. This isn't necessarily an indictment of AI technology as a whole—it's potentially an indictment of corporate IT departments thinking they can out-engineer existing applications from AI service providers like OpenAI.

*eyeroll*

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

And who is pushing the idea that AI is a magic money printer for businesses? It could never be OpenAI and their ilk, they're too honest for that! Shoves massive piles of stolen training data under the couch

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

They're making Peter Molyneux look trustworthy.