Greentext

6982 readers

1953 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

767

Anon thinks there is a bicurious double standard (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 day ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

275 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I have no issues acknowledging a conventionally attractive guy, I do however seem to have absolutely no notion of what this actually looks like. I know by dint of existing in the 21st century that Brad Pitt, George Clooney etc are considered attractive, but for the life of me I couldn't take that knowledge and apply it to someone else. I can spot an egregiously "unattractive" dude, but there's a very broad spectrum of men that just look like "blokes" to me.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

This was the 2000's and I just used "wouldn't look out of place in as a magazine model", which while is a high standard, still has a lot of variety.