this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
527 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

9213 readers
2760 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The comment is translating what you said. Hope this helps 💖

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And Im challenging your assertion. First, liberalism is not right of MAGA. Second, even a government run by people like Newsom would be a safer place for trans people.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, given how much the federal government will be destroyed by then, there will probably be more regular violence and more threat of civil war. We're never going back to the stability or liberalism of the past, only an era of opportunists tearing the empire apart.

But yes, we won't be as in danger for our identity as trans people, only more in danger like everyone else will generally be.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Ill believe civil war is a thing when I see it. You cant get people on the left to agree that we should take power away from the GOP any way possible. These arent the type of people rushing out to die for each other.

And if youre speaking from a place of planned chaos: you severely underestimate the complacency of the american people.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Any non complacency will be redirected to serve power hungry separatists or unionists, just like your energy is being redirected to serve Newsom right now. Americans are too in love with serving shitty people to ever not pick another shitty person to support over actual reform. Any hope I had in popular resistance has been snuffed out by people like you. Thank you for confirming that we're on our own.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Sorry, no, leftists would still need to broaden their tent to include those, "americans too in love with serving shitty people" in their revolution but as YOU demonstrate, they never will. You would plan a revolution and start a terrorist organization.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I have no delusions of unpopular revolutions, only keeping other people as safe as possible from the bullshit you shitty people get up to. I only request you strive for the American ideal of leaving people alone instead of the American common practice of genocide and enslavement.

Tis a shame someone from the supposedly anarchist instance is worried about left wing terrorists and opposing a fascist reject.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Every anarchist should be worried about becoming the thing they detest. If the anarchist ever wants to actualize their ambitions they have to rationalize their ideas.

Just because the children you interact with wear an A and pretend they are out there punching NAZIs doesnt mean they know shit.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If the anarchist ever wants to actualize their ambitions they have to rationalize their ideas.

Not sure what this has to do with refusing to ally with someone who's shown to be a bad ally. It's not ideologically purity, but basic interpersonal relations.

I also get the whole "anarkiddies are weak and foolish" thing is easy, but that doesn't make your shit argument any better.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

What dont you get? Its numbers. Do you think everyone you meet is a secret leftist that just needs someone to enlighten them?

You know what. Thats fine, maybe there is some truth there if there was someone who could properly communicate the good ideas leftists harbor. Except, no one has even started to consider how to do it. Instead we have clout chasers vying for views so they can escape capitalism the only real way available to them, succeeding at it.