this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
614 points (95.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

22311 readers
1213 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 56 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

The left doesn’t need their opinions constantly validated by personalities. The left enjoys (and understands) satire more. Voices like Colbert, and Jon Stewart, and John Oliver.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Are my eyes failing me, or are they not in the chart?

Having a hard time pre-deciding who and what content I think should appear in such a chart. Vlog brothers? e-newspapers?

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Josh Jonson Taylor Tomlinson hell 60% of the standup comedians easily. The picture would be much different with them in. Colbert alone would blow rogan out the water.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

In that case, I think this chart is probably saying more about what kinds of media people with different leanings consume, not so much about deep pockets or a generational shift.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Late Show with Colbert has 10.1mil subscribers on Youtube, so yeah it should be on there.

If you expand to network TV for this chart — which I think you should, cuz all network TV has a digital presence too these days — it had an average of 2.42mil viewers per episode on TV through Q2.

Joe Rogan, for comparison, boasts 11mil listeners per episode.

So even just based on equating to network TV viewership, he’d probably be somewhere between MeidasTouch and The Breakfast Club.

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There's probably some truth to this, but it also leans into the "MSM is lying to you" narrative that's pervasive in far right (and far left) circles. A production with [the appearance of] a low budget is associated with "genuineness" by most people. You can't be paid off by the big corpos if you're doing it out of the goodness of your heart...or so the reasoning goes.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I frequently see people on the left commenting “I don’t recognize this as a trusted source.” Or “Is this just someone’s blog?” Or, “I’m not seeing this published anywhere else.”

There is a lot of astroturfing, garbage, and propaganda that gets published online and on TV. I wish people would look into things more before believing everything they see on tv or read. People’s critical reading skills have definitely gone out the window, and it is totally being taken advantage of.

It’s not just politics either. Lots of fake product reviews, medical misinformation, etc. constantly showing up in search results, YouTube ads, TikTok videos, etc. And influencers are just the new “As Seen On TV” pitchmen of this century.

You don’t see Colbert or Stewart, or Oliver trying to sell you timeshares, or snake oil, or get rich quick schemes. Quite the opposite.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago

that sounds alot more like right wingers pretending to be on the left, to stok anger division, i dont pay attention to those posts.