this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
30 points (94.1% liked)

Political Videos

83 readers
78 users here now

Overview:

The place to post political videos


founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree that that’s the law, but why? Why should we make throwing things that can’t harm someone assault? If you throw a pb & j at someone who’s allergic to peanuts, or throw a dense sandwich really hard at someone standing on a high precipice, that’s a different story (and those are each covered by other crimes), but no harm was intended or caused by this. Why should it be illegal?

Edit: I can get behind littering as a charge here, but that looks very different on a background report…

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I don't actually really know the full answer to that. If I had to guess, I would say that there generally need to be pretty distinct objective lines for when something becomes a crime (you can't have like a weight limit or something to where "throwing a sandwich" isn't a crime but then transitions to a crime as the object gets more and more hazardous up to where throwing a rock is a crime.) I think it is generally that it winds up being a sensible system just because simple battery just really isn't all that serious a charge. You can get convicted, in theory, just because you swatted someone's arm away, or threw a cup of water at them, or whatever, and it really just won't impact you all that much. (But then, if it's a rock or if you injure the person, or something like that, then it's a different and more serious charge than simple battery.)

Again, the trouble comes in when you're dealing with the cops and do one of those "simple battery" things and all of a sudden it comes with life-changing consequences.