this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
141 points (96.7% liked)

Games

41497 readers
985 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cartridges to discs were definitely a massive savings... and happened basically one and a half times (Sega to the CD and Sony from nothing to the Playstation)

Digital... is complicated. It definitely benefits the platform holder and lowers production costs for the major publishers (and makes indie games viable) but it also fundamentally changes marketing. Because people generally don't browse the PSN Store to find new games. They only get recommendations from influencers. Whereas plenty of us have fond memories of standing in a Best Buy or Circuit City and picking what game looked good on the shelves.

But yes. I agree that not every single generation should have led to a price jump. But I can definitely see an argument for most of them to have raised the price of "AAA" games with tiered pricing beyond that. Because it really is a problem and not just for the major publishers. Indie games basically need to launch at an effective price of 10-20 bucks on PC to stand a chance and... that is great money for the small dev teams but not so much for a medium sized C/B tier game.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

The huge win in digital for them was killing the resell market.

No used games means no competition from previous owners. Prices can stay at $60/70/80 forever without any user market forcing prices down.

Every media vendor wants digital only to cut production costs, but it's really to own the market. Consoles did exactly that for decades. The shift to subscriptipns for not only online at all but also to "dont own games, just give us a monthly part of your invome forever" was them pushing this advantage to its maximum conclusion.

Only now, with falling sales and falling interest due to "quick media" like tiktok/instagram/etc, is microsoft giving up on its console moat and sharing all games across devices. Only a loss of relevance as an entertainment medium is forcing them to open the market up again.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

People vastly overestimate the impact of reselling on games... and that actually includes the platform holders themselves.

20 years ago? Yeah, Blockbuster was a scourge and there were even some magazine articles about noticeable dips in profit when a popular movie came out (because parents would bring kids to the rental store) and so forth. And Gamestop became a big enough player that they allegedly contributed to the death of the PSP Go

These days? Gamestop is all but dead even though most major studio releases still have physical copies. Because the game itself is increasingly a loss leader with the idea being that people will buy DLCs or even sequels. Project 10 Dollars WORKED except now it is Project 30-90 Dollar Season Pass. And... at that point, it makes a lot of sense to just sell the base game for 20 bucks or even give it away "for free" as an IGC.

And a good point of reference is Nintendo. If they were only interested in shelf space they would do what PC games have done for closer to decades than not: just put a piece of paper in a box. Instead, they have the asinine "game card" system which avoids the cost of cartridges while still allowing for resell. And... you can all but guarantee that Nintendo ain't doing things for the consumer. Hell, back when they were arguably THE leaders in console gaming, Microsoft basically began their death spiral by trying to do largely the same thing for the XBOX One (which also included things like software to support watch parties of shows with friends). If game reselling was such a massive blight on their revenue they would never have tried that.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

People don't browse the PSN store, because it's crap. I mean, the steam store is pretty bad, but I still manage to just browse and bookmark some games there to get back to later.

I mean the discovery queue is pretty much on point except for the blockbusters they insert "because they are popular". I don't care whats popular, i care about what i like, roguelike indies and metroidvanias for example.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 4 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Who chooses to buy games based on influencers? I rely on reviews.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Cant even rely on reviews anymore.. I forget what game it was, but there was a game had a massive pay to win scheme in the game.. that was only added on launch day, so the reviewers copies didnt have it.. So they gave glowing reviews on the gameplay, without the game having the pay to win store and all the gameplay nerfs that encourage using it.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There's only 2 sources I've properly trusted and i think they count as influencers

Yahtzee from zero punctuation and the guy from penny arcade.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

I generally trust Skill Up as well

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago

And who writes those reviews? I'll give you a hint. It starts with an "i".