Fuck AI

3749 readers

445 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

356

ChatGPT 5's PHd level intelligence is breathtaking \s (infosec.pub)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by slaacaa@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I saw this on reddit, thinking it’s a joke, but it’s not. GPT 5 mini (and maybe sometimes 5) gives this answer. You can check it yourself, or see somebody else’s similar conversation here: https://chatgpt.com/share/689a4f6f-18a4-8013-bc2e-84d11c763a99

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

I understand how my comment was unclear, but I was attempting to underscore the fact that it cannot determine the difference. That's why I included the whole statistically plausible bit. My point is that AI as it currently functions is fundamentally flawed for several use cases because it cannot operate as it "should". It just says things with no ability to determine the veracity.

The first portion of my comment was addressing the suggestion that there was a "reason" to lie. My point is there is no good justification to providing factually incorrect answers, and currently there is no way to stop AI from doing so. Hope that clears things up.