Fuck AI

3735 readers

624 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

356

ChatGPT 5's PHd level intelligence is breathtaking \s (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by slaacaa@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I saw this on reddit, thinking it’s a joke, but it’s not. GPT 5 mini (and maybe sometimes 5) gives this answer. You can check it yourself, or see somebody else’s similar conversation here: https://chatgpt.com/share/689a4f6f-18a4-8013-bc2e-84d11c763a99

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just because "AI" models have named contrived systems after words related to intelligence does not magically make it true. "Reasoning models" are just shit algorithms tying multiple word blenders together in an attempt to mimic intelligence. There is nothing actually reasoning, no matter what some shit executive decides to name it.

Even in your own cited post, they say their system merely tries to determine if it should use a different model to answer a question, not that it's actually producing any level of "reasoning" what so ever. It's just picking a different model, ffs.