this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
356 points (95.9% liked)

Fuck AI

3749 readers
445 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
356
ChatGPT 5's PHd level intelligence is breathtaking \s (infosec.pub)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by slaacaa@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I saw this on reddit, thinking it’s a joke, but it’s not. GPT 5 mini (and maybe sometimes 5) gives this answer. You can check it yourself, or see somebody else’s similar conversation here: https://chatgpt.com/share/689a4f6f-18a4-8013-bc2e-84d11c763a99

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then it should not be used ~~for getting the news?~~

FTFY

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

True but LLMs genuinely are useful when you want random things like fiction, roleplay, etc.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, they're not totally useless, but that doesn't make their current iteration or rampant proliferation ethical or even worth defending.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Agreed. I have the same opinion about crypto and all current new "innovations" in tech. Everything blown to a bubble without any real utility.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As long as you don't care about consistency, maybe...

(I mean, since they can't learn without retraining the whole model, if you're writing anything of any significant length you'd basically need to refeed them the whole context and backstory so far every prompt, which I assume would eventually hit some prompt size limit...)

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

True. I meant it is useful for one time things like game night or something, not for work.