Perry Bible Fellowship

🤣

edit: since I'll be referencing this conversation should I see this user again uphold a double standard in debate I'll state this:

If by "my position" they meant veganism, it doesn't require that plants aren't sentient. It's a sufficient condition to show veganism is the morally superior option (and imo rather obviously true, if annoying formally prove because you have to get settled on formal definitions first). However, given that plants and animals are both sentient the argument (a variation of which is presented in the text which started this whole chain)

"Meat 'production' requires a multiple of plant by mass, not to mention how many many many more plants have to 'die' by the numbers to feed one animal before you murder it."

also implies that veganism is the morally superior option.

If they meant a different position, well they didn't elaborate, this is my best guess.

Edit 2: 🤣🤣