this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
635 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

12963 readers
951 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34366718

I guess the IBX is loud enough to wake the dead?

The article in question

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It's my opinion that we should be making cemeteries parks. I know I personally would be much happier if, when I die, and if I were to have a grave, that the space would be useful. Also, the "headstone" could instead be park equipment, like a bench or swings or something. Maybe some space could be set for gardens, and you can choose to be buried there. I don't understand cemeteries that are made solely for bodies to be thrown in and mostly not useful to society.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I'm pretty sure the cemeteries around where I live (at least the old public ones) are parks, technically. It's just that they don't really have recreational amenities, so people don't have much reason to visit them.

(The notable local exception is Oakland Cemetery which is historically-important enough to be managed by a foundation that puts on events and stuff.)

I think the one good thing trump has done in his entire life is to bury his ex-wife on his golf course. Golf is already a phenomenal waste of land, might as well bury people there too.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cemeteries act like parks in that they drastically improve the cooling of cities. Plus they act like a small wildlife resort for some animals (like birds and squirrels) because there is much reduced foot traffic compared to parks, usually more trees and less noise.

Besides, cemeteries are useful for society because they allow family members to grief and remember which I'm fairly certain is beneficial for mental health.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the grieving thing, they really don’t need that much land to do it. I think the other commenter is generally correct, though.

When it comes to the wildlife thing, it’s all just low-height grass monocultures and maybe a few trees if you’re lucky. That’s not really doing the animals any favours, they need taller grasses and bushes to hide in, and more tree density than a cemetary allows for. A dense urban forest with a footpath would be far better. An example of this is Montréal’s Parc Angrignon, if you want to check that out.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, a densely forested park is better than a cemetery. In my experience, most parks are not this type though and many cemeteries - especially those more than a century old - have more trees.

I mean, take a look at e.g. Greenwich Park in London. That's nearly a golf course!

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Sounds like we just need to make better parks, then, no? Like, we’re already asking for change so why not just have that be part of it?

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago

My personal idea is human composting combined with tree planting (if that material is suitable for it).

Each tree planted for the deceased, growing (partially) from their remains. Should be good enough of a memory for the bereaved, and you'll get people taking care of the planted trees, instead of some stones.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Hot take: end all burials, mandatory organ donation. No their religious or cultural reason does not matter more than anyone's life.