this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
53 points (94.9% liked)

Selfhosted

50550 readers
396 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi y’all, thanks for the help with my question yesterday. I did a bit of homework, and I think I’ve got things figured out. Here’s my revised plan:

  1. configure a cron job to update DuckDNS with my IP address every 5 minutes

  2. use ufw to block all incoming traffic, except to ports 80 and 443, to allow incoming traffic to reach Caddy

  3. configure the Caddyfile to direct traffic from my DuckDNS subdomain to Jellyfin’s port

Does this seem right this time? Am I missing anything, or unnecessarily adding steps? Thanks in advance, I’ll get the hang of all this someday!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Thanks for the tip! I’ll back the refresh rate off to be safe.

I’m not sure I entirely understand your concern about putting Jellyfin on the internet. A large part of my interest in selfhosting is being able host my own music library, my own cloud storage, etc, and access it as an alternative to Spotify or Google Drive. Doesn’t that inherently mean that they need to be on the internet, if I want to be able to access them when I’m away from home?

My goal has been to find a way to do that safely, but if that’s not possible, that’s good to know too, so I don’t keep trying to do the impossible.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I just finished refining my Jellyfin setup. I use caddy as reverse proxy and use authelia as authentication in front of Jellyfin. This way only users logged in to authelia can access my Jellyfin. And there is an SSO plugin for jellyfin to avoid double login. The tricky part was getting apps to work.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's honestly just a matter of how much risk you are comfortable with for using jellyfin on the open internet.

(If i remember correctly:) The unauthenticated routes thing can only be used for streaming your content without a login (if you can guess the contents ids on your server I believe).

In my opinion, it's not worth the hassle of using a vpn because I don't think this risk is worth mitigating with one.

But everyone has their own personal risk assesment of course.

P.s. Easier than a VPN, at least for logging in other users, would be to use some type of proxy authentication like Authelia. I believe jellyfin has a plugin you can use. It can be complicated to setup, but it's an option. I believe it should protect all routes exposed by jellyfin so that solves the unauthenticated streaming issue. (I still dont think this is necessary but more choice for the risk-adverse!).

https://github.com/authelia/authelia

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yes, those are the known vulnerabilities. We don't know how many unknown vulnerabilities could be discovered in the future.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately no software exists that is fully perfect in this regard (any program could have multiple bugs just waiting to be found), but jellyfin being open source puts it in a better situation for finding vulnerabilities sooner.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

And are these the ones they let people see what media I have or are there any serious ones?

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

At least we are more likely to hear about them than we would for PMS. Quickest way to find vulnerabilities is to have as many eyes as possible on it, if you only let the 20 devs you employ look a lot can be missed. Just my opinion though.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wireguard or tailscale are much better ways of accessing jellyfin from outside your network.

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

What if I want a bunch of people to be able to log into my library via Finamp?

[–] ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I highly recommend Tailscale, you can share machines/services with unlimited friends on the free tier, and all of the actual auth stuff is handled by someone who isn't me.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Provide them with VPN access. If that's too much for them, then they don't get access. Tough. On the scale of security vs convenience, that's nothing.

If you really really want, you should at least see if you can put a WAF in front, and put the server itself somewhere it doesn't have access to the rest of your network (a DMZ) so that if and when it gets hacked, it doesn't compromise the entire network.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You use plex instead, or you accept the massive security vulnerabilities.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What vulnerabilities? Sure there are some but nothing massive that I have seen. Care to post them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 2 days ago

web endpoints with zero authentication lol